Skip to main content

Security report for ibfoodtech.com

IB FOODTECH · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IB FOODTECH is a Latvian-based food technology consulting and training company with over 15 years of experience in the food and beverage production sector. The company targets small and medium-sized food producers, cafes, restaurants, schools, kindergartens, and mobile caterers in Latvia, offering specialized services including compliance with international food safety standards such as ISO 22000, BRC GS, and FSSC 22000. Their business model focuses on B2B service delivery, supporting clients in business startup and development phases with documentation, training, and ongoing consultation. Technically, the website is built on the Webador CMS platform and employs modern JavaScript libraries, Facebook Pixel for marketing, and Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused visitor tracking. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some SEO and accessibility improvements could be made. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business front with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear privacy and security policies, and improving WHOIS transparency to boost trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ibfoodtech.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IB FOODTECH occupies a niche market in Latvia, providing essential food technology consulting and training services to a diverse client base within the food production and catering sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive industry experience and certifications aligned with international food safety standards. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to engage with clients and promote services. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting contracts, training programs, and certification assistance. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with certification bodies and digital platform providers like Webador. Growth indicators include the addition of online hygiene training and active social media presence. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding digital presence and formalizing compliance documentation to enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The current security posture of the IB FOODTECH website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Facebook Pixel introduces moderate user tracking but is balanced by the use of Plausible Analytics, a privacy-conscious tool. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting trust and domain legitimacy. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and clearer compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy page clearly outlining data collection, usage, and GDPR compliance measures.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Obtain and display domain WHOIS information or use verified domain registration to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IB FOODTECH
Description
Pārtikas tehnologu komanda ar vairāk kā 15 gadu pieredzi, sniedz kvalitatīvus pārtikas tehnologu pakalpojumus mājražotājiem, kafejnīcām, restorāniem, ražotnēm, skolām un bērnudārziem Latvijā.
Key services
Pārtikas tehnologu pakalpojumi, Apmācības, Starptautisko standartu konsultācijas (ISO 22000, BRC GS, FSSC 22000)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics
Platforms
Webador CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with an English section available.
  3. Business focuses on food technology consulting and training services.
  4. No explicit privacy policy page found but privacy info is partially present on contact page.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
  9. Website built on Webador CMS platform.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on the Webador CMS platform, leveraging JavaScript frameworks and third-party services such as Facebook Pixel and Plausible Analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes basic SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no significant loading delays detected. The technical stack is modern but lacks advanced security configurations such as HTTP security headers. The site uses JSON-LD structured data for organization information, enhancing search engine understanding. There is an opportunity to improve technical SEO, accessibility, and security posture to reduce technical debt and enhance operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ibfoodtech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ibfoodtech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.