Skip to main content

Security report for ibesip.cz

BESIP · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BESIP is the primary governmental body responsible for coordinating road safety efforts in the Czech Republic. It operates as an expert authority under the Ministry of Transport, focusing on education, awareness campaigns, and policy support to improve traffic safety for all road users including pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, motorcyclists, children, and seniors. The website serves as a comprehensive resource offering educational materials, campaign information, statistics, and guidance tailored to various audiences. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with modern JavaScript libraries and is hosted on a government domain, ensuring a professional and authoritative presence. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, CSRF protection, and cookie consent mechanisms, although some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for government domains, but the domain's .gov.cz TLD and consistent branding strongly support its legitimacy. Overall, BESIP's website is a well-maintained, trustworthy platform that effectively supports its mission of enhancing road safety in the Czech Republic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ibesip.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BESIP holds a strong market position as the Czech Republic's official road safety coordinator, backed by the Ministry of Transport. Its business model centers on public service and education rather than commercial revenue. The site targets a broad audience including the general public and professionals in road safety education. BESIP leverages partnerships with other government agencies and organizations to run campaigns and educational projects. The website's content quality and navigation support effective user engagement. While direct contact details are limited, the presence of official social media channels and comprehensive policy documents enhance credibility. The organization benefits from government backing, which provides stability and authority in its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, CSRF tokens on forms, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could be addressed to improve transparency and readiness. The use of up-to-date libraries and frameworks is positive, but ongoing maintenance is necessary to mitigate risks. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from additional security best practices and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible to users and security researchers.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BESIP
Description
BESIP is the main coordinating body for road safety in the Czech Republic, an expert authority focusing on human factors in traffic safety, operating as an independent department of the Ministry of Transport of the Czech Republic.
Key services
Road safety education, Traffic safety campaigns, Statistical data publication, Guidance for various road users, Coordination of road safety strategies
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, Bootstrap 4 and 5, Swiper.js, Google Maps API, ShareThis, Moment.js, Simple Lightbox
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured for multiple road user groups.
  3. Strong focus on education, campaigns, and official statistics.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are clearly implemented and linked.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to government domain registration policies.
  8. Use of multiple modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  9. Social media presence on major platforms with official accounts.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a legacy ASP.NET WebForms platform integrated with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, and Google Maps API. It uses Kentico CMS inferred from resource paths. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with clear navigation. Performance is moderate, likely due to the mix of legacy and modern technologies. The presence of multiple external scripts and CDNs supports functionality but requires monitoring for security and performance. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization to improve speed and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ibesip.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ibesip.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.