Skip to main content

Security report for i4c-event.com

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website i4c-event.com is a Japanese language content platform focused on facial esthetic salons and clinics in the Hakata area. It provides detailed information about facial esthetic treatments, skin care techniques, and local attractions to appeal to individuals interested in beauty and wellness. The business model appears to be content-driven, likely monetized through affiliate marketing or advertising, targeting a niche local audience. The domain is relatively new, created in late 2022, consistent with the website's content and market positioning. Technically, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting and DNS are managed by reputable providers, but DNSSEC is not enabled. The site uses Shift_JIS encoding, which is less common and may impact SEO and accessibility. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal but present. Analytics are implemented via a third-party tracking service (Research Artisan Pro), indicating moderate user tracking without visible privacy compliance mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and DNSSEC, which lowers its security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and contact information is limited to a contact form without emails or phone numbers, reducing trust and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, with no suspicious patterns detected. Overall, the website is functional and provides relevant content for its niche but lacks comprehensive privacy, security, and contact transparency. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact information would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching i4c-event.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention i4c-event.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for i4c-event.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the beauty and wellness sector, specifically targeting facial esthetic services in Hakata, Japan. It serves a small market niche with localized content and recommendations. The business model likely relies on affiliate marketing or advertising revenue, supported by external links to various unrelated domains. The site lacks visible certifications or trust badges, which may impact competitive positioning. Growth potential depends on improving user trust, expanding contact transparency, and enhancing privacy compliance. The partnership ecosystem is unclear, with no identified related or partner domains. The site’s content quality is good but could benefit from stronger branding consistency and professional polish.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory, but no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity to secure DNS resolution. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, and no security or privacy policies are published. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking without visible consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns. The lack of contact emails or phone numbers reduces the ability to report security incidents. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security risks and lacks a mature security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance considerations.
  4. Add clear company contact emails and phone numbers to improve trust and incident reporting.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides detailed information and rankings about facial esthetic salons and clinics in Hakata, Japan, focusing on facial esthetic treatments, skin care techniques, and local attractions.
Key services
Facial esthetic salon recommendations, Beauty treatment information, Local area lifestyle and attraction content
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Japanese and focuses on facial esthetic salons in Hakata.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a contact form; no emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No social media links or business certifications displayed.
  5. External links mostly to unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or advertising related.
  6. Uses a third-party tracking service (Research Artisan Pro) for analytics.
  7. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC enabled.
  8. Domain registration is recent but consistent and legitimate.
  9. Website uses Shift_JIS charset which is less common and may affect SEO and accessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without a detected CMS or modern frameworks. It uses Shift_JIS character encoding, which may limit compatibility and SEO effectiveness. Hosting and DNS are managed by GMO Internet Group and Xserver.jp, reputable providers in Japan. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. The site includes a third-party analytics script (Research Artisan Pro) for user tracking. There is no evidence of advanced technical debt, but the lack of modern security practices and privacy compliance indicates areas for modernization. Improving technical SEO, accessibility, and security configurations would reduce operational risks and improve business outcomes.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with i4c-event.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review i4c-event.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.