Skip to main content

Security report for i2-ethics.com

i2 Ethics · Other · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

i2 Ethics is a Spanish-based compliance service provider specializing in anonymous whistleblowing channels and compliance with ENS and ISO 27001 standards. The company positions itself as an experienced niche player with over 10 years of expertise, targeting businesses requiring secure and compliant reporting mechanisms. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern technologies such as TailwindCSS and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting and domain registration are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring reliable infrastructure and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Contact is available via a web form but lacks direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the website is trustworthy, secure, and well-positioned for its market segment but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching i2-ethics.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention i2-ethics.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for i2-ethics.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the compliance and whistleblowing services sector, offering anonymous reporting channels compliant with ENS and ISO 27001. Its business model focuses on providing secure, expert-driven compliance solutions to organizations, likely targeting medium to small enterprises in Spain. The market positioning leverages certifications and over a decade of experience as trust signals. The website content and metadata emphasize compliance and security, appealing to regulated industries. The absence of direct contact details suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly to maintain confidentiality. The company uses reputable hosting and registrar services, indicating operational maturity. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified, suggesting a focused standalone operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and multiple security headers implemented. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with blocking mode, enhancing privacy compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of direct incident response contacts reduces readiness visibility. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  3. Add explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information, ideally via a security.txt file.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
i2 Ethics
Description
Protege tu empresa con nuestro canal de denuncias anónimo. Confía en expertos con más de 10 años de experiencia en cumplimiento.
Key services
Anonymous whistleblowing channel, Compliance consulting, ENS and ISO 27001 compliance support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, W3 Total Cache, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, FluentForm, TailwindCSS
Frameworks
GeneratePress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommendation)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Spanish with English alternate language available.
  3. Strong focus on compliance services with certifications highlighted.
  4. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with blocking mode.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage.
  6. Contact available only via form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  8. Good SEO and meta tag implementation including Open Graph and Twitter cards.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the GeneratePress theme and enhanced with TailwindCSS for styling. It employs W3 Total Cache for performance optimization and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by Cloudflare, offering CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic but functional. Performance is moderate, with caching enabled but some heavy scripts loaded asynchronously. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and formalize privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with i2-ethics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review i2-ethics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.