Skip to main content

Security report for i-advokats.lv

SIA “Zvērināta advokāta Laura Klagiša birojs” · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.klagiss.lv represents a modern online legal service provider specializing in corporate law and related legal fields in Latvia. The firm, SIA “Zvērināta advokāta Laura Klagiša birojs”, offers a broad range of legal services including commercial law, insolvency, intellectual property, tax law, real estate, civil law, labor law, AML and sanctions, administrative law, data protection, contract drafting, and transaction management. The site targets Latvian businesses seeking professional legal assistance with a focus on convenience through online access and subscription services. Technically, the website is built on the MultiScreenSite CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Snowplow. It also supports PWA features with service workers and includes CAPTCHA on forms for security. The security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. Contact information is transparent and professional, including email, phone, and social media links. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching i-advokats.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small-sized legal service provider focused on Latvian corporate clients. Its business model includes online legal consultations and subscription-based legal support, which is a modern approach in the legal sector. The firm leverages digital marketing and content through a regularly updated blog to engage clients and establish thought leadership. The presence of social media and WhatsApp contact indicates a client-friendly communication approach. The website's partnership with heise marketing suggests professional digital marketing support. No indications of parent or subsidiary companies were found. The firm appears to maintain a strong local market presence with a focus on quality and client trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA protection on forms to prevent spam. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML source. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly configured, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No public security or incident response policies are found, which is typical for small legal firms but could be improved for transparency. Analytics and tracking are implemented responsibly with privacy compliance. Overall, the site is secure for its business purpose but could benefit from additional security hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce explicit security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a security policy or incident response page to improve transparency and client trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure information to align with best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
SIA “Zvērināta advokāta Laura Klagiša birojs”
VAT number
LV50203303171
Registration number
50203303171
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Zvērināta advokāta Laura Klagiša birojs”
Description
Moderns tiešsaistes advokātu birojs, ar specializāciju uzņēmumu juridiskajā apkalpošanā un 15 gadu pieredzi.
Key services
Komerctiesības, Maksātnespēja, Intelektuālais īpašums, Nodokļu tiesības, Nekustamā īpašuma lietas, Civiltiesības, Darba tiesības, AML un Sankcijas, Administratīvās tiesības, Personas datu aizsardzība
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, FontAwesome, Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics, Service Worker (PWA enabled), Elfsight widgets
Platforms
MultiScreenSite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics, Google Analytics (gtag)
Marketing tools
Elfsight widgets
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and contact form.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security incidents or vulnerability disclosures publicly visible.
  8. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. Website targets Latvian businesses needing legal services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform with a clean and professional design. It uses standard web technologies including jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts. The site is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and includes PWA features such as service workers for offline support. Performance is moderate with CDN usage for static assets. Analytics and marketing tools are integrated effectively. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The site could improve by adding more accessibility features and optimizing security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly online legal service.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with i-advokats.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review i-advokats.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.