Skip to main content

Security report for hyros.ai

Hyros · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hyros is a technology company specializing in AI-driven ad tracking and attribution software designed to optimize advertising ROI for high-level digital businesses. The company offers a patented system that improves ad targeting accuracy and scales ad spend effectively. Their market position is strong, supported by high-profile clients and extensive testimonials. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Intercom, and Wistia for video content. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms, reflecting good compliance practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  5. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: oe7zxnlzybbdcrbk3mifuwxtwq6o3hv65ibnhbsqznl4wpdh2kaq.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hyros.ai

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hyros operates in the technology sector, targeting medium to large digital advertisers including e-commerce, SaaS, info education, and agencies. Their business model is SaaS with a focus on custom onboarding and concierge support. The company leverages AI and proprietary print tracking technology to deliver superior attribution accuracy, enabling clients to optimize ad spend and increase conversions. Their ecosystem includes integrations with major ad platforms and marketing tools. The presence of multiple high-profile endorsements and a strong testimonial base indicates a competitive advantage and market trust. The company maintains a clear focus on data-driven marketing optimization and long-term revenue forecasting.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses secure third-party services like Google Tag Manager and Intercom. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Security headers are not explicitly detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be elevated by formalizing and publishing security governance documents and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency by including physical contact information or phone numbers for business inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hyros
Description
Hyros offers advanced ad tracking and attribution software using AI to optimize ad targeting and increase ROI.
Key services
Ad Tracking and Attribution, E-commerce Analytics, Call Tracking, SaaS Analytics, Link Attribution Software
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Intercom, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Wistia video embeds, Google Analytics (gtag.js), CookieLaw.org cookie consent, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Tag Manager used securely
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom, Wistia
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with comprehensive content about AI-driven ad tracking software
  2. Strong emphasis on accuracy, ROI improvement, and AI optimization
  3. Multiple testimonials and high-profile client endorsements
  4. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No visible security or privacy red flags
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on main page or footer
  8. Contact primarily via email support@hyros.com and contact pages
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, and Wistia for video embedding. The HTML is well-structured with comprehensive meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. Performance is moderate with optimized media and responsive design ensuring excellent mobile experience. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site is well-optimized for SEO with canonical tags, Open Graph metadata, and clear navigation. Technical risks are minimal, but adding more security headers and formalizing security documentation would reduce potential attack surface and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hyros.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hyros.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.