Skip to main content

Security report for husitstvi.cz

Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website husitstvi.cz is a well-established Czech informational and educational platform dedicated to the Hussite period in Czech history. It offers a comprehensive range of content including historical articles, indexes, literature references, galleries, multimedia, and a discussion forum, targeting historians, researchers, students, and enthusiasts. The site is multilingual and has a consistent branding approach with a clear focus on cultural heritage. Technically, it is built on an older WordPress CMS version with common plugins like Yoast SEO and jQuery libraries, hosted by a reputable Czech provider (REG-WEDOS). While the site is functional and moderately optimized for SEO and mobile, it uses outdated software versions which pose security risks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks modern security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. No contact emails or phone numbers are directly visible, but a contact form page exists. The site integrates Facebook social media but does not use analytics or advertising networks extensively, resulting in minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe, with a good content quality score but needs improvements in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching husitstvi.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Husitstvi.cz operates as a niche cultural and educational resource focusing on Czech Hussite history, serving a specialized audience interested in historical research and cultural heritage. Its business model is informational with community engagement through forums and multimedia content. The site benefits from long domain age and partnerships with local museums and hosting providers, enhancing credibility. However, it lacks commercial features or monetization visible in the content. The partnership ecosystem includes the Husitské muzeum and Wedos hosting, indicating local support. Growth indicators are limited but the site maintains relevance through updated content and multilingual support. Strategic observations suggest focusing on modernizing technical infrastructure and enhancing privacy and security compliance to maintain trust and user engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. The WordPress version (4.9.26) and jQuery (1.12.4) are outdated, exposing the site to potential vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were found in the HTML content. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contacts. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The site uses Facebook SDK for social integration, which may introduce third-party tracking. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from updates and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress and all JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website dedicated to the history, faith, military aspects, indexes, articles, literature, galleries, multimedia, links, and discussion forum about the Hussite movement in Czech history.
Key services
Historical articles, Indexes and registers, Literature references, Galleries and multimedia, Discussion forum
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery Migrate 1.4.1, Fancybox 2.1.3, Google Fonts (IM Fell Double Pica), Facebook SDK
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical and links (https://husitstvi.cz/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Czech historical and educational resource about the Hussite period.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by updating software and adding security headers.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found; contact form page exists.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content or domains.
  7. Use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions may pose security risks.
  8. No advertising networks detected except Facebook SDK for social integration.
  9. No analytics services detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on WordPress 4.9.26 with Yoast SEO plugin and uses jQuery 1.12.4 along with jQuery Migrate 1.4.1, and Fancybox 2.1.3 for UI elements. Google Fonts are used for typography. The hosting provider is REG-WEDOS, a Czech hosting company. The site is moderately optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some outdated libraries that could impact speed and security. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal but present. The site uses Facebook SDK for social media integration but no evident analytics or advanced marketing tools. Technical debt is present due to outdated CMS and libraries, which should be addressed to reduce security risks and improve performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with husitstvi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review husitstvi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.