Skip to main content

Security report for hup.hr

Hrvatska udruga poslodavaca · Government · Croatia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.hup.hr represents the Croatian Employers' Association, an established organization founded in 2001 that advocates for employers in Croatia. The site serves as a platform for providing information and support to its members, primarily targeting business entities and employers within the country. The domain registration data aligns well with the organization's identity, reinforcing its legitimacy and trustworthiness. Technically, the website employs standard technologies including Google Analytics with IP anonymization and an accessibility widget (OmoWidget), indicating a commitment to user accessibility and some privacy considerations. The site is hosted with Azure DNS and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. However, the technical implementation lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy disclosures, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms and shows no signs of vulnerabilities or malicious content. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as terms of service, reduces the site's compliance posture, particularly regarding GDPR requirements. Contact information and incident response channels are not clearly presented, which may impact user trust and responsiveness to security incidents. Overall, the website is moderately professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and clearer business contact information to improve its security posture and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hup.hr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Croatian Employers' Association operates as a membership-based organization providing advocacy and support services to employers in Croatia. Its market position is well-established given the domain age and national scope. The business model focuses on representing employer interests, influencing policy, and offering consulting services. The target audience includes Croatian businesses and employers seeking representation and support. The organization likely generates revenue through membership fees and related services. The website's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiary or partner domains were identified. Growth indicators and strategic observations suggest a stable presence with opportunities to modernize digital engagement and compliance. SecurityPosture: The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and some privacy considerations via IP anonymization in analytics. However, the lack of security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and security culture. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information, which are important for GDPR and NIS2 compliance. The site would benefit from formalizing these aspects to enhance its security posture and regulatory adherence. Recommendations: Prioritize publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implement security headers, and provide clear contact channels for security incidents. Enhancing transparency and compliance will improve trust and reduce risk exposure.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization, reflecting some privacy awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the provided content. Forms and inputs are not clearly identified, limiting assessment of secure data handling. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance and incident readiness. Overall, the site is functional and secure at a basic level but should adopt best practices to strengthen defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  5. Enhance SEO metadata and accessibility features to improve user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hrvatska udruga poslodavaca
Description
Croatian Employers' Association representing employers in Croatia, providing advocacy, support, and services to its members.
Key services
Advocacy, Consulting, Member support, Policy influence
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, OmoWidget accessibility widget, Azure DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page content.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization indicates some privacy consideration but lacks full compliance disclosures.
  5. Accessibility widget (OmoWidget) is implemented, indicating attention to accessibility.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled and domain uses reputable DNS.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. Website appears to be a government-related or non-profit employer association in Croatia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack including Google Analytics for user tracking and an accessibility widget (OmoWidget) to improve usability. DNS is managed via Azure DNS, indicating reliable hosting infrastructure. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. The HTML content is valid but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indicators, suggesting a custom or simple CMS implementation. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Mobile optimization is basic but supported by the accessibility widget. SEO optimization is minimal with limited metadata and no structured data detected. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security headers, metadata, and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hup.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hup.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.