Skip to main content

Security report for huntloc.com

Huntloc · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Huntloc is a technology company specializing in real-time hunting tracking applications and GPS-GSM tracking devices for hunting dogs. Founded in 2013 and based in Estonia, the company targets hunters and hunting dog owners with a niche product offering that enhances hunting efficiency and safety. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and FontAwesome, and integrates extensive analytics and tracking tools to monitor user engagement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent mechanisms in place but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the site presents a professional and consistent brand image with moderate trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching huntloc.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
65
Average
60
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Huntloc operates in a specialized segment of the technology industry focused on hunting GPS tracking solutions. Its business model revolves around selling GPS tracking devices and providing a companion mobile app for real-time location tracking. The company maintains an active social media presence across major platforms, enhancing brand visibility and customer engagement. The domain age and registration details align with the company's claimed history, supporting legitimacy. However, the absence of explicit contact information and privacy/legal policies on the main page may limit user trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a focused market niche and a technology-driven product offering.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts, which may introduce privacy and security risks if not properly managed. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely security issue management. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve security readiness.
  4. Review and update third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Huntloc
Description
Reaalajas jahi jälgimise äpp ning jahikoerte jälgimislahendus. Huntloci GPS-GSM jälgimisseadmega koera asukohta näeb oma nutitelefonist.
Key services
Real-time hunting tracking app, Hunting dog GPS tracking devices
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Bootstrap 4.5.2, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, PixelYourSite, UpScale Tracking
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, PixelYourSite
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, MonsterInsights, PixelYourSite
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, PixelYourSite, UpScale Tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based e-commerce site focused on hunting GPS tracking solutions.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with high confidence.
  4. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are active, indicating extensive user behavior tracking.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked in structured data.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML content.
  8. Domain WHOIS data shows a long-standing registration with no privacy protection.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, using Bootstrap 4.5.2 for responsive design and FontAwesome for icons. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, PixelYourSite, and UpScale Tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected in the HTML content. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The technical infrastructure is modern but would benefit from improved security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with huntloc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review huntloc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.