Skip to main content

Security report for hundezentrum-snoopy.de

Hundezentrum Snoopy · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hundezentrum Snoopy is a small, locally focused dog training and care service provider based in Grebenstein, Germany. The business offers a variety of services including puppy and young dog training, individual training sessions, bootcamps, dog sports like mantrailing, social contact hours, dog day care, and boarding (pension). Additionally, they provide seminar room rentals and host events related to dog training. The company is led by Milena Drönner, a certified dog trainer with credentials from the CANIS Hundeakademie, enhancing the business's credibility and trustworthiness. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence with clear navigation and comprehensive service descriptions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hundezentrum-snoopy.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hundezentrum-snoopy.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hundezentrum-snoopy.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the pet care and training sector, targeting dog owners in the Grebenstein region and surrounding areas. Its competitive advantage lies in certified expertise, a large training and care facility (7,000 sqm), and a diverse service portfolio that includes training, care, and event hosting. The business model is service-oriented with direct customer engagement through bookings and events. The presence of social media channels and customer testimonials supports a positive reputation and customer trust. The company appears to be a standalone small business without subsidiaries or parent companies, focusing on quality and local market penetration.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. It uses reputable WordPress plugins for caching, GDPR compliance, and event management, which contribute to a solid security baseline. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and GDPR compliant. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response communication.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize exposure to known vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hundezentrum Snoopy
Description
Das Hundezentrum Snoopy ist in Grebenstein mit einem 7.000 qm großes Gelände. Wir bieten Hunde-Training und -Beschäftigung an sowie Betreuung / Pension.
Key services
Welpen- und Junghundekurse, Einzeltraining, Bootcamp, Mantrailing, Sozialkontaktstunden, Betreuung und Pension, Seminarraumvermietung, Veranstaltungen mit Hunden
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Elementor, W3 Total Cache, Events Manager plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin, OceanWP theme
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable WordPress plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to dog training and care services.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern WordPress ecosystem with Elementor and caching plugins.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No evidence of security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  9. No advertising or tracking beyond cookie consent detected.
  10. No analytics services explicitly detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and caching plugins for performance optimization. Hosting appears to be with a German provider (1&1 IONOS) based on nameservers. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely benefiting from caching but could be further optimized. The technical stack is mature and well-supported, though some security enhancements are recommended. The site integrates event management and GDPR compliance plugins, reflecting a well-rounded technical infrastructure suitable for a small service business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hundezentrum-snoopy.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hundezentrum-snoopy.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.