Skip to main content

Security report for hund.io

Hund, LLC. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hund, LLC. operates a hosted status page and monitoring service platform designed to help organizations monitor their services and communicate incidents effectively. Positioned as a trusted provider for universities, Fortune 500 companies, and smaller enterprises, Hund offers a subscription-based SaaS model with a free trial and a straightforward pricing plan. Their key services include automated status pages, multi-channel notifications, rich metrics, and customizable branding with API access. Technically, the website is hosted on AWS infrastructure, uses modern TLS protocols, and integrates JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Google Tag Manager. Performance is somewhat slow with a large page size and many resources, but mobile optimization and user experience are good. Security posture is solid with strong TLS configuration and SPF/DMARC email protections, though improvements are needed in DNSSEC, CAA records, HSTS, and certificate transparency compliance. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism despite using tracking tools. Overall, Hund demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for security enhancements and privacy compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hund.io

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hund is positioned in the technology sector as a niche provider of status page and monitoring services. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a highly customizable platform with robust API support and multi-channel notifications. The business model is subscription-based with a single unrestrictive pricing plan, targeting a broad audience from large enterprises to smaller organizations. The company emphasizes reliability and transparency, evidenced by their public status page and infrastructure redundancy claims. Partnerships include integrations with major email and monitoring providers. Growth indicators include a modern website with active content and a roadmap page. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and expanding incident response transparency to strengthen customer trust.

Security posture

Hund's security maturity is moderate to good. The website supports strong TLS versions (1.2 and 1.3) with no known major SSL vulnerabilities. Email security is reinforced with valid SPF and DMARC records, though DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a notable gap. The absence of HSTS and incomplete CAA records reduce HTTPS enforcement and certificate issuance control. The site lacks advanced security headers that could mitigate common web attacks. No explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which may impact trust and compliance. The security page exists but does not detail frameworks or certifications. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in DNS security, HTTPS policies, and transparency around incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and correctly configure CAA DNS records to restrict certificate authorities.
  3. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  4. Achieve Certificate Transparency compliance to improve certificate issuance transparency.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden web security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Hund, LLC.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using JavaScript with jQuery and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is on AWS, indicated by DNS nameservers. The site supports modern TLS protocols with OCSP stapling enabled. Performance is slow with a large page size and many resources, suggesting optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO are basic. No CMS or major frameworks are explicitly detected. The site uses custom CSS and supports Liquid markup for customization. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC, incomplete CAA records, and lack of HSTS, which could expose the site to certain attacks. Modernization efforts should focus on performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hund.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hund.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.