Skip to main content

Security report for humblegroup.shop

Other · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website humblegroup.shop is currently a parked domain with minimal content indicating it is for sale. There is no substantive business information, contact details, or privacy and security policies present. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML and JavaScript with external ad and tracking scripts from third-party domains. No HTTPS or security headers are detected, which significantly lowers the security posture. The WHOIS data shows a suspicious future creation date, suggesting possible data errors or placeholder information. Overall, the site lacks professionalism, trust indicators, and compliance features, making it unsuitable for business use in its current state.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching humblegroup.shop

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
72
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain appears to be held for sale or parking purposes without active business operations. There is no evidence of a company name, legal entity, or operational business model. The target audience is general internet users who may be interested in purchasing the domain. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The business model is domain resale, which is common but offers limited market positioning or competitive advantage. Revenue streams are likely limited to domain sales or advertising revenue from parking scripts.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible security or privacy policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The presence of multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts increases privacy risks. The domain's WHOIS data inconsistencies further reduce trust. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception and lacks basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Provide clear contact information and business details to improve credibility.
  4. Remove or replace domain parking content with meaningful business content.
  5. Add security headers and conduct a security audit to identify and fix vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This domain appears to be a placeholder or parked domain with a message indicating it may be for sale.
Key services
domain sale
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
youseasky.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain landing page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS detected in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple external ad and tracking domains present.
  6. WHOIS data shows suspicious future creation date.
  7. No forms or user input fields detected.
  8. No social media or email contacts found.
  9. Content is safe and non-adult.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting appears to be via parkingcrew.net nameservers, typical for parked domains. Performance is moderate but limited by external ad scripts. Mobile optimization is basic with minimal responsive design. SEO is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond a simple description and no structured data. Accessibility features are absent. The technical debt is high given the minimal content and lack of modern web practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving content quality, and implementing SEO and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with humblegroup.shop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review humblegroup.shop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.