Skip to main content

Security report for humansofux.com

Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Humans of UX is a community-driven project focused on mapping and surveying UX professionals in Slovakia and Czechia. The website serves as a platform to collect data on UX trends, tools, education, and work conditions in the region. It targets UX professionals and aims to provide insights into the local UX market. Technically, the site is built on Webflow CMS, hosted on Webflow's CDN, and uses common web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and has a professional design with clear navigation. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form submissions to third-party email marketing services. However, it lacks visible security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the active and professional website presence. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its intended audience but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching humansofux.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in a niche market segment focused on UX professionals in the Czechoslovak region. It leverages community engagement through surveys and data sharing. The business model appears to be non-commercial or community-centric, relying on voluntary participation and data collection. The presence of multiple organizers with social media profiles suggests a collaborative effort. The site uses third-party email marketing platforms for communication. There is no evidence of direct revenue streams or commercial transactions on the site. The project is small in scale but well-positioned within its target community. Partnerships with email marketing providers are evident, but no other business partnerships or subsidiaries are identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and incident response readiness. The WHOIS data absence is a notable risk factor for domain legitimacy. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a community survey site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Najväčšie sčítanie československých UX profesionálov. The site aims to map the current state of UX professionals in Slovakia and Czechia, capturing trends, tools, education, and work conditions.
Key services
UX professional census, Survey data collection, Results dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS, jQuery, WebFont Loader, Font Awesome, Unicons
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form submission to external mailing services

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Ecomail (email marketing), Mailchimp (email marketing)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found on the site.
  3. Contact email is a third-party domain (suxa.sk), not matching main domain.
  4. Multiple social media profiles linked for project organizers.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. WHOIS data missing, raising legitimacy questions.
  7. Site uses Webflow CMS and hosting with standard external analytics.
  8. Forms submit data to external email marketing platforms (Ecomail, Mailchimp).
  9. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  10. Content is in Slovak language primarily, targeting UX professionals in Slovakia and Czechia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring reliable uptime and performance. It uses modern web fonts loaded via Google Fonts and includes common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and WebFont Loader. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Card metadata. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure is suitable for the site's purpose but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with humansofux.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review humansofux.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.