Skip to main content

Security report for hudabash.com

Fotogrāfs Sergejs Hudabašjans · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fotogrāfs Sergejs Hudabašjans is a small photography business based in Latvia, specializing in food, event, wedding, product, interior, and urban photography along with video services. The website serves as a portfolio and contact point for potential clients, showcasing a variety of photographic works. The business appears to be locally focused with a clear service offering and a consistent brand presentation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Fancybox, and Jarallax. It employs Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Hosting appears to be through NameCheap, consistent with the domain registrar information. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which could improve its security posture. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response or security policies, indicating gaps in compliance and security transparency. Contact information is limited but includes a WhatsApp phone number and a contact form. Overall, the website is functional and professional for a small photography business but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security headers, and clearer contact and policy disclosures to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hudabash.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the photography services sector, targeting clients needing food, event, wedding, and product photography primarily in Latvia. Its market position is that of a small, local service provider with a portfolio-driven business model. Revenue likely derives from direct client engagements for photography and video services. The website supports client acquisition and brand presentation but lacks advanced e-commerce or subscription features. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited to website content and domain age. The business ecosystem appears independent with no visible external partnerships or affiliations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection active. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely response to security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve browser security.
  4. Publish an incident response policy or contact channel for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Improve accessibility features and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fotogrāfs Sergejs Hudabašjans
Description
Photography services specializing in food, events, advertising photo and video services.
Key services
Food photography, Event photography, Advertising photo and video services, Wedding photography, Product photography, Interior and detail photography, Nature and urban photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Analytics, Fancybox, Isotope, Jarallax, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based photography portfolio and service site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is limited to a WhatsApp phone number and a contact page form.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No DNSSEC and no security headers detected.
  7. Domain registration is consistent and legitimate.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and uses common JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements and galleries. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics. The site loads moderately fast but could benefit from performance optimizations. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, but the lack of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level and has SEO meta tags but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility optimizations. Hosting is inferred to be via NameCheap, consistent with the domain registrar. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hudabash.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hudabash.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.