Skip to main content

Security report for hubshare.com

M-Files · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

M-Files is a technology company specializing in knowledge work automation and collaboration solutions, prominently featuring the Hubshare collaboration platform. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence with a focus on enhancing client experience through seamless document and content sharing. The company targets knowledge workers and businesses seeking efficient document management and collaboration tools. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, multiple analytics platforms, and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and visible security policies. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data introduces some trust concerns, although the website content and social media presence support legitimacy. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, suggesting room for compliance improvement. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and credible but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hubshare.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

M-Files holds a leading position in the knowledge work automation market, offering key services such as the Hubshare collaboration solution that facilitates file sharing and content collaboration. The business model revolves around software platform provision targeting medium-sized enterprises and knowledge workers. The company has a consistent brand presence and leverages multiple social media channels for outreach. The website's integration of advanced SEO and marketing tools reflects a strategic approach to customer acquisition and engagement. However, the lack of visible domain registration data and privacy policies may affect user trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain a focused partnership ecosystem, although no explicit partner domains were identified in the content. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and active social media engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communications, but the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site lacks visible incident response or security policy documentation, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing website but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve trust and transparency.
  4. Establish and display incident response and security policies accessible to users.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and remove any unnecessary or risky integrations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
M-Files
Description
M-Files is the leading platform for knowledge work automation. Hubshare Collaboration Solution from M-Files boosts digital client experience by enabling seamless sharing of files, documents, and collaboration content.
Key services
Hubshare collaboration solution, Document and file sharing, Content collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft fonts, YouTube iframe API, Matomo Analytics, Clarity Microsoft Analytics, HubSpot scripts, Bing Ads, Reddit Pixel, Drift Chat, Clearout Email Verification
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM), DrivenIQ Pixel, AttributionApp
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Drift Chat, Clearout Email Verification
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content.
  5. Contact information includes company email and phone number with high confidence.
  6. Website built on WordPress with Yoast SEO and modern web fonts.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL usage implied but not confirmed.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies on site.
  9. Good SEO and content structure with JSON-LD structured data present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized platform. It uses a variety of web fonts and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The technical stack is robust but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and streamlined third-party script management to reduce attack surface and improve performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hubshare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hubshare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.