Skip to main content

Security report for hub88.io

HUB88 Limited · Technology · Malta

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HUB88 Limited operates a technologically advanced casino games aggregation platform, offering a single API to integrate over 12,000 games from more than 100 suppliers. The company positions itself as the fastest aggregator in the iGaming industry, targeting operators and suppliers seeking efficient and scalable integration solutions. Their platform includes a powerful back office, personalized player content, and a payments platform, supported by 24/7 live customer support and transparent platform status monitoring. The company is licensed and regulated by the Malta Gaming Authority, enhancing its credibility in the regulated gaming market. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services. It employs analytics tools including Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing and analytics setup. The website is well-optimized for mobile devices, has good accessibility features, and demonstrates strong SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses standard security headers, and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and formal security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement to enhance compliance and trust. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, with no privacy protection masking ownership, and a long registration period indicating business stability. Overall, HUB88 presents a professional, secure, and credible online presence with minor gaps in privacy compliance and formal security disclosures. Strategic improvements in these areas would further strengthen their market position and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hub88.io

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HUB88 is positioned as a key player in the iGaming technology sector, focusing on casino game aggregation and seamless integration via a single API. Their competitive advantage lies in speed of integration, extensive game library, and a robust back office. The business model is B2B, serving operators and suppliers globally, with a focus on regulated markets such as Europe and Asia. Revenue streams likely include licensing fees, integration fees, and transaction fees via their payments platform. The company demonstrates growth through continuous onboarding of new game providers and personalized content offerings. Partnerships with top suppliers and regulatory compliance with MGA enhance their ecosystem credibility. The presence of 24/7 support and transparent platform status reflects a customer-centric approach and operational maturity.

Security posture

The security posture of HUB88 is solid with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party services like Cloudflare and Google Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and formal security policies indicates partial compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented, which could be a risk in case of security incidents. Overall, the security culture appears mature but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR and privacy regulation compliance.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal terms and user agreements.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
HUB88 Limited
Registration number
C86394
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HUB88 Limited
Description
Hub88 offers the fastest casino games aggregation with a simple API for quick, secure, and seamless integration. It provides access to 12,000+ games, a powerful back office, an efficient payments platform, and personalized content for players.
Key services
Casino games aggregation, Single API integration, Payments platform, Back office and reporting tools, Personalized player content, Fraud detection and alerts
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully accessible.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Comprehensive business and contact information provided.
  4. Strong trust signals including MGA license and transparent status page.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy documents beyond privacy policy.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Telegram.
  9. No phone numbers found with clear company context.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered on React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and optimized performance. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. The use of GraphCMS as a headless CMS indicates a flexible content management approach. Performance appears fast with preloading of critical assets and asynchronous loading of scripts. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for continuous monitoring of third-party analytics and marketing scripts to avoid introducing vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hub88.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hub88.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.