Skip to main content

Security report for hrubaborsa.eu

Obec Hrubá Borša · Government · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.hrubaborsa.eu serves as the official online presence for the municipality of Hrubá Borša in Slovakia. It provides comprehensive local government information, including news, event calendars, public services, and contact details for municipal officials. The site targets residents and visitors seeking municipal services and community updates. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook SDK, and Google Translate, ensuring accessibility and multilingual support. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and includes accessibility features, contributing to a positive user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers are not evident in the provided data. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for EU domains, and no suspicious patterns were detected, supporting the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture and good privacy compliance for a government entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

    • High

      No Name Servers Found

      Unable to find name servers for domain

      What to do: Configure proper name servers for the domain

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hrubaborsa.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
35
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hrubá Borša's municipal website positions itself as a key information hub for local governance and community engagement. Its business model is public service-oriented, focusing on transparency and accessibility of municipal resources. The site integrates with partner domains for statistics, cadastral data, and local services, enhancing its utility. The presence of e-commerce elements for local services indicates a modest revenue stream supporting municipal operations. The target audience is primarily local residents, with content tailored to their needs. The site shows consistent branding and professional content, reinforcing trust and credibility. Growth indicators include active news updates and community event promotion. The partnership ecosystem includes governmental and local service providers, reflecting a collaborative approach to municipal management.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms indicate awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security certifications. Compliance with GDPR appears adequate based on privacy policy presence and consent management. Overall, the site maintains a secure baseline appropriate for a municipal portal but would benefit from enhanced security controls and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize risk from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance privacy policy details to explicitly cover data retention and user rights in compliance with GDPR.
  5. Consider obtaining security certifications or seals to boost user trust and demonstrate commitment to security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Hrubá Borša
Description
Official website of the municipality Hrubá Borša, providing local government information, news, services, and community resources.
Key services
Municipal news and announcements, Public service information, Contact details for municipal officials, Event calendar, E-commerce for local services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook SDK, FontAwesome, Google Translate
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Google Translate, Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal portal for Hrubá Borša, Slovakia.
  2. Content is rich with local government info, news, and services.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to privacy protection by EURid.
  4. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and includes accessibility features.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policy indications present.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom or proprietary CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and external services such as Google reCAPTCHA and Facebook SDK. It uses responsive design techniques and includes accessibility features, supporting a broad user base. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and images to optimize load times. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The site integrates multilingual support via Google Translate. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts without visible integrity checks and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize security posture and improve performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hrubaborsa.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hrubaborsa.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.