Skip to main content

Security report for hplstarpsienas.lv

HPL · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HPL Starpsienas is a Latvian manufacturer specializing in the production and installation of various types of partition walls for both public and private projects. Their product portfolio includes WC partitions, urinal partitions, shower partitions, changing rooms for retail stores, office partitions, and decorative partitions. They offer both professional installation services and DIY kits with all necessary components included. The company targets construction companies, architects, retail store owners, and project developers within Latvia. The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and Astra theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. It is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Security headers are not implemented, representing an area for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a basic but functional online presence for a small manufacturing business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hplstarpsienas.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hplstarpsienas.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hplstarpsienas.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on partition walls, a niche within construction materials. Their business model combines product manufacturing with installation services and DIY options, catering to a range of customers from private individuals to commercial projects. The website content is primarily in Latvian with an English version available, indicating some international outreach. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information on the site suggests a small-sized enterprise with a local market focus. The presence of direct contact details supports customer engagement. The company does not appear to have visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked from the website. The use of modern web technologies like Elementor and Google Analytics shows some investment in digital marketing and user experience.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking. The site should implement security best practices and privacy compliance measures to improve its security posture and reduce legal risks. Regular updates and vulnerability scanning are recommended to maintain security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins promptly.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are accessible and consistent with business information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HPL
Description
HPL Starpsienas produces various types of partition walls manufactured in Latvia, targeting both public and private projects. Their product range includes WC partitions, urinal partitions, shower partitions, changing rooms in clothing stores, office partition walls, decorative partitions, and others. They offer installation services and DIY options with all necessary parts included.
Key services
Manufacture of partition walls, Installation services, DIY product kits
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.7.12, Elementor, Astra Theme, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Slab), Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme.
  4. HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics tracking.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  6. Contact info includes a company email and phone number in header.
  7. No security headers detected; security posture can be improved.
  8. Content is business-focused, safe, and relevant to manufacturing sector.
  9. No social media links or certifications found.
  10. Site navigation and language switching between Latvian and English present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.12 with Elementor and Astra theme, a common and flexible CMS setup. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons, and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with basic accessibility features. Performance appears moderate, with no explicit optimization indicators found. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. The site structure is clear with multilingual support for Latvian and English. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hplstarpsienas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hplstarpsienas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.