Skip to main content

Security report for hpi.cz

HPI · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HPI-CZ is a leading Czech company specializing in the distribution and sale of building accessories, particularly for roofing and insulation systems. The company targets B2B customers in the construction sector, offering a wide range of products supported by technical advice and customer support. Their market position is strong within the Czech Republic, supported by a professional online presence including an online catalog and ordering system. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome. The site is mobile optimized and includes SEO best practices. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header, though additional headers could improve security further. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear GDPR and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification, but the overall professional presentation and business information support the company's credibility. Recommendations include enhancing security headers and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hpi.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
95
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hpi.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hpi.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HPI-CZ operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors focused on building materials, specifically roofing accessories and insulation. Their business model revolves around wholesale distribution and direct sales supported by an online catalog and ordering platform. The company maintains partnerships with international suppliers and regional partners, enhancing their product range and market reach. Their target customers are primarily construction companies and contractors in the Czech Republic. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position. The company demonstrates good digital maturity with integrated analytics and social media presence, supporting marketing and customer engagement efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and a Content-Security-Policy header restricts script and media sources, reducing risk of cross-site scripting attacks. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the site lacks several recommended security headers such as X-Frame-Options and HSTS, which could mitigate clickjacking and downgrade attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and formalized vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS).
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure guidelines and contact information.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and WordPress plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by documenting data retention policies and user data handling practices.
  5. Consider adding incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve security communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HPI
Description
Společnost HPI-CZ patří sortimentem a poskytovanými službami k lídrům na českém trhu v oblasti dodávek příslušenství pro všechny druhy střešních krytin a pro zateplování budov.
Key services
Distribution of roofing accessories, Sales of building insulation products, Customer support and technical advice, Online catalog and ordering system
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy restricting scripts and media sources
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. Clear business focus on building materials and accessories.
  3. Multiple contact methods and physical addresses provided.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. Use of standard web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. Font Awesome provides iconography. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are integrated for analytics and social media functionality. The site loads scripts asynchronously where appropriate and uses a Content-Security-Policy header to restrict resource loading. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format describing the organization and breadcrumb navigation. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hpi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hpi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.