Skip to main content

Security report for horskasluzba.cz

Horská služba ČR, o.p.s. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Horská služba ČR, o.p.s. is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to mountain rescue and safety services. The website serves as an official information portal providing updates on rescue operations, avalanche warnings, and safety guidelines for mountain visitors. It is supported by government funding and partnerships with recognized entities, positioning it as a trusted national mountain rescue service. The site targets outdoor enthusiasts and the general public seeking safety information in mountainous regions of the Czech Republic. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Leaflet.js for interactive maps and Google Tag Manager for analytics, with a basic but functional mobile experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements in security headers and incident response disclosures are recommended. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, but the absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty in domain legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching horskasluzba.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on mountain rescue and public safety. Its business model relies on government grants and donations, supplemented by an e-shop for branded merchandise. The website reflects a well-established entity with a clear market position as the official mountain rescue service in the Czech Republic. Partnerships with ministries and corporate sponsors enhance credibility and resource availability. The content and navigation are designed to serve a broad audience including tourists, cyclists, and winter sports participants. The presence of multiple regional sections and real-time weather and avalanche data indicates a comprehensive service offering. Growth potential lies in expanding digital services and cross-border cooperation with neighboring rescue organizations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Use of Google Tag Manager is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the lack of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust from a domain registration perspective, though the site content and partner logos mitigate this concern. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing incident response information, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security transparency.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain trust and legitimacy perception.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices and for users with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Horská služba ČR, o.p.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Horská služba ČR, o.p.s.
Description
Horská služba ČR při výkonu své činnosti organizuje a provádí záchranné a pátrací akce v horském terénu, poskytuje první pomoc a mnoho dalšího.
Key services
Mountain rescue and search operations, First aid provision, Avalanche warnings and safety information, Public education and awareness, E-shop for branded merchandise
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Leaflet.js, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to mountain rescue services.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is available but no direct emails found in HTML.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and map integration (Leaflet).
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Google Analytics is used with consent management.
  9. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with libraries such as jQuery and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. FontAwesome provides iconography, and Google Tag Manager manages analytics and tracking scripts. The site includes a cookie consent banner powered by TermsFeed, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with some preloading of fonts and images. Mobile optimization is basic, with a fixed viewport width and some responsive elements. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and landmarks but could be improved. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation menus and content sections.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with horskasluzba.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review horskasluzba.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.