Skip to main content

Security report for hornivltava.cz

Mikroregion Horní Vltava-Boubínsko · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mikroregion Horní Vltava-Boubínsko is a regional non-profit interest association focused on the development and cooperation of municipalities located in the Šumava National Park and Protected Landscape Area. The organization supports local development projects, cultural heritage preservation, and tourism promotion within its member municipalities. The website reflects a well-structured regional portal with clear navigation and relevant content for residents and visitors. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flexslider, and Fancybox, providing a moderate level of interactivity and responsiveness. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with a small regional government or non-profit entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hornivltava.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Mikroregion Horní Vltava-Boubínsko as a key regional player in local development and cultural heritage preservation within the Šumava region of the Czech Republic. Its partnerships with regional government entities and local municipalities strengthen its market position. The business model revolves around project implementation and regional cooperation rather than commercial revenue streams. The target audience includes local residents, tourists, and stakeholders interested in regional development. The presence of social media links and analytics indicates active engagement and monitoring of visitor behavior. The lack of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit nature. The organization appears to maintain a focused ecosystem with trusted partners and a clear mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS for secure communication and implements a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit HTTP security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS) were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency in handling security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and CookieScript is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a regional non-profit but could benefit from enhancements in security headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect any changes in data processing or regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mikroregion Horní Vltava-Boubínsko
Description
Samotné jádro Mikroregionu Horní Vltava-Boubínsko tvoří obce na území NP a CHKO Šumava. Obce leží v povodí horní části Studené a Teplé Vltavy a okolí Boubína.
Key services
Regional development projects, Cultural heritage preservation, Promotion of tourism and local municipalities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Flexslider, Font Awesome 5.5, Fancybox 5, Animated Collapse JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics script loaded via HTTPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieScript Consent Management Platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  6. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and interactivity.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  8. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with standard cookies.
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a traditional web technology stack with jQuery and related UI libraries, Flexslider for image sliders, and Fancybox for modal galleries. The CSS is modular with multiple stylesheet files for layout, menus, and specific content areas. The site is mobile responsive with viewport meta tags and media queries. Performance is moderate, with some inline scripts adjusting slider heights dynamically. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the site uses external Google Fonts and Google Analytics. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. There is room for modernization by adopting newer frameworks or optimizing asset delivery. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and clear navigation menus, supporting good SEO and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hornivltava.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hornivltava.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.