Skip to main content

Security report for hopin.com

RingCentral Events (formerly Hopin) · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RingCentral Events, formerly known as Hopin, is a leading SaaS platform specializing in virtual events and webinars. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including custom branding, engagement features, virtual event venues, and high-quality streaming capabilities. Positioned strongly in the technology sector, RingCentral Events targets businesses and marketing teams seeking to create engaging online event experiences. The platform benefits from RingCentral's acquisition, enhancing its market position and expanding its product ecosystem with subsidiaries like Session and StreamYard. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and various JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and AOS for animations. Hosting and DNS services are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring fast performance and reliable uptime. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices, providing an excellent user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information published. Tracking scripts from Google and LinkedIn are present without an explicit cookie consent mechanism, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and business credibility. The domain registration data aligns well with the company's history and branding, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing a clear cookie consent banner to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hopin.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RingCentral Events operates in the competitive virtual events market, leveraging its SaaS model to provide scalable and customizable event solutions. The acquisition by RingCentral strengthens its market position by integrating communications and collaboration tools. The company targets enterprise and medium to large businesses, focusing on marketing teams and event organizers. Its ecosystem includes related products like Session and StreamYard, expanding its service offerings. Customer testimonials and partnerships with reputable organizations such as HP, HubSpot, and NYU reinforce its credibility. The business model relies on subscription and service-based revenue streams, with a focus on innovation in video technology and global audience engagement.

Security posture

The website maintains a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in transparency and defense-in-depth. Tracking technologies are used responsibly but without explicit cookie consent, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security score is good but could be improved by adopting additional best practices such as security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Review and enhance HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen client-side protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RingCentral Events (formerly Hopin)
Description
Run engaging webinar and event experiences that reflect your brand, build community, and create a lasting impression on your audience from start to finish.
Key services
Custom branding, Engagement features (chat, Q&A, integrated apps), Virtual event venues (reception, stages, networking), Streaming and community building
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Swiper.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll), ChiliPiper, Warmly widget, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
RingCentral Events platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
ChiliPiper, Warmly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website clearly indicates rebranding from Hopin to RingCentral Events.
  2. Strong emphasis on virtual event platform capabilities and customer engagement.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and trusted brand logos enhance credibility.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner found despite tracking scripts present.
  6. Contact form collects detailed business-related information for sales leads.
  7. Social media presence is active with official company profiles linked.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published on site.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and leverages modern JavaScript libraries for UI/UX enhancements such as Swiper.js for sliders and AOS for scroll animations. Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight tags are used for analytics and marketing. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for accessibility and SEO. The contact form integrates with ChiliPiper and Workato for lead management, indicating a mature marketing automation setup. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, performant, and well-maintained with minor opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hopin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hopin.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.