Skip to main content

Security report for homoecos.lv

Homoecos.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Homoecos.lv is an independent Latvian-language informational website focused on online gambling, providing detailed guides, reviews, and explanations about online casinos, games, bonuses, and legal regulations in Latvia. The site targets Latvian online gambling players ranging from beginners to experienced users, offering comprehensive content to help users navigate the online gambling environment responsibly. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Google Fonts, with a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. The website is accessible without any WAF or security blocking mechanisms detected. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and user experience but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching homoecos.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as an informational platform in the online gambling sector in Latvia, serving as a resource for players seeking knowledge about online casinos, game types, bonuses, and legal frameworks. It does not appear to be a gambling operator but rather an independent review and guide site. The business model likely relies on affiliate marketing or advertising, although no explicit affiliate programs or ad networks were detected in the provided content. The site targets the Latvian market specifically, with content tailored to local regulations and player interests. The absence of detailed company registration or contact emails limits transparency. The site maintains consistent branding and provides trust signals such as disclaimers and links to responsible gambling resources. Growth potential exists with increasing online gambling popularity in Latvia, but enhanced transparency and privacy compliance would strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used as indicated by canonical URLs, but no explicit security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS) were detected in the provided HTML snippet. No forms or input fields were found that collect personal data, reducing immediate risk exposure. No incident response or security policies are published on the site. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms indicates partial GDPR compliance. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing security headers, cookie consent banners, and publishing security and incident response policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including contact information for security issues.
  4. Attempt to retrieve and publish verified WHOIS and business registration information to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Consider adding verified company contact emails and social media links to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Homoecos.lv
Description
Neatkarīgs informācijas avots par tiešsaistes kazino un tiešsaistes kazino spēlēm Latvijā, piedāvājot recenzijas, ceļvežus un informāciju par azartspēļu industriju, spēļu veidiem, bonusiem un likumdošanu.
Key services
Informācija par tiešsaistes kazino, Spēļu apraksti un ceļveži, Bonusu un akciju pārskati, Likumu un regulējuma skaidrojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical link
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; registrar and domain age unknown.
  3. Site provides comprehensive information about online gambling in Latvia in Latvian language.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected; cookie policy not found.
  5. Contact information limited to a phone number; no email or contact forms found.
  6. No social media links or business registration details found.
  7. No security or incident response policies visible on site.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  9. Site uses Google Fonts and custom CSS/JS files.
  10. Footer contains links to privacy policy and terms of service pages, but URLs not explicit.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, and uses Google Fonts for typography. The site structure is semantic and includes SVG icons for UI elements. No CMS or backend platform was detected from the HTML. Performance is likely moderate given the use of minified CSS and JS files, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tags and responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA labels and semantic HTML but could be improved. SEO optimization is good with meta description, canonical link, hreflang, and structured navigation. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with modern security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with homoecos.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review homoecos.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.