Skip to main content

Security report for hoermann.ch

Hörmann · Manufacturing · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hörmann is a leading European manufacturer and supplier specializing in garage doors, front doors, interior doors, frames, and drive systems. The company targets a broad audience across Europe, with a strong presence in Switzerland as indicated by the website domain and language. The website is professionally designed, consistent in branding, and uses modern technologies such as TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The technical infrastructure supports moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks published security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website reflects a credible and established business with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hoermann.ch

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hörmann holds a strong market position as a leading European provider of doors and related products. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and direct supply to customers across multiple European countries, supported by localized websites and language alternates. The company leverages a professional digital presence with international reach. The use of Cookiebot and Google Analytics indicates a mature approach to marketing and user data collection. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies may impact trust among privacy-conscious customers. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand and has a well-structured website that supports customer engagement and product information dissemination.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent management, reflecting compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or published security policies, such as incident response or vulnerability disclosure. No security.txt file was found, and no direct contact channels for security incidents are provided. The use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics introduces moderate tracking, which is managed via Cookiebot. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive security policies, implementing additional HTTP security headers, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response procedures.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hörmann
Description
Europas führender Anbieter von Toren, Türen, Zargen und Antrieben.
Key services
Garage doors, Front doors, Interior doors, Frames, Drive systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Roboto font, Swiper.js
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Multiple language alternates indicate international presence.
  6. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system. It uses modern frontend technologies including Roboto fonts and Swiper.js for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and consent management, respectively. The site is optimized for mobile devices and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. No critical technical vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hoermann.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hoermann.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.