Skip to main content

Security report for hobbypraha.cz

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website hobbypraha.cz is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) block, presenting a security challenge page instead of actual content. This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, contact, or policy information. The domain WHOIS data is suspicious, showing a creation date in the future (June 18, 2025), which undermines trust and legitimacy. No metadata, forms, or external business links are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare for security and hosting, but no further details can be ascertained due to the block. From a security perspective, the presence of a Cloudflare WAF indicates some level of protection against attacks, but the lack of accessible content and suspicious WHOIS data raise concerns about the domain's authenticity and operational status. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, and no contact or incident response information is available, limiting compliance and transparency assessments. Overall, the website's risk profile is elevated due to inaccessibility, suspicious registration data, and absence of verifiable business information. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration details, ensuring website accessibility for legitimate users, and publishing essential compliance and contact information once accessible. Due to the WAF block, the AI scoring is capped low, and most observations remain unknown or blocked. For a comprehensive analysis, direct access to the live website content is necessary.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hobbypraha.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the current website content as it is blocked by Cloudflare WAF. The domain registration data is inconsistent and suspicious, with a future creation date, which does not align with typical business operations. No information about market positioning, business model, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The lack of contact or company details further limits any business insights.

Security posture

The website is protected by Cloudflare WAF, indicating a baseline security measure against common web attacks. However, the absence of accessible content prevents evaluation of security headers, SSL configuration, or secure coding practices. The suspicious WHOIS data and lack of transparency on security policies or incident response readiness are negative indicators. No vulnerabilities or security best practices can be confirmed or denied due to lack of content.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and correct domain WHOIS registration data to reflect accurate creation date and registrant information.
  2. Ensure website accessibility for legitimate users by reviewing Cloudflare WAF rules and false positive triggers.
  3. Publish essential compliance documents such as privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service once accessible.
  4. Provide clear contact and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Implement and verify security headers and SSL configuration to enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Detected Cloudflare security block page indicating access is blocked by WAF. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF block.
  2. No actual website content available for analysis.
  3. No metadata, forms, contact info, or business data found.
  4. WHOIS data is suspicious with future creation date.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies detected.
  6. No security policies or incident response info available.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No social media or external business links found except Cloudflare.
  9. Content safety is safe but no content to evaluate.
  10. Analysis incomplete due to WAF/security mechanisms. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security services including WAF. The HTML content is minimal and represents a Cloudflare block page, indicating the site is currently inaccessible to the user. No CMS or additional technologies are detectable from the provided HTML. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The domain's future creation date in WHOIS is a technical anomaly that should be investigated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hobbypraha.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hobbypraha.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.