Skip to main content

Security report for historickemestoroku.cz

Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska, z.s. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.historickemestoroku.cz represents the Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska, a non-profit association dedicated to the preservation and promotion of historic towns in the Czech Republic. It primarily focuses on organizing the 'Historic Town of the Year' competition and related cultural heritage initiatives. The site targets municipalities, heritage professionals, and the general public interested in cultural preservation. The business model is non-commercial, relying on partnerships with government ministries and cultural organizations to promote historic town regeneration and awareness. Technically, the website uses a custom CMS called Public4u, integrates jQuery and Mapy.cz APIs for interactive maps, and employs standard web technologies. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no evident broken elements or errors. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is reasonable for a non-profit entity. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its cultural heritage mission effectively. Strategic improvements include adding privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and publishing vulnerability disclosure information to strengthen compliance and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of historickemestoroku.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching historickemestoroku.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention historickemestoroku.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for historickemestoroku.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a recognized position within the Czech cultural heritage sector, partnering with government ministries such as the Ministry for Regional Development and the Ministry of Culture. Its competitive advantage lies in its established reputation and official partnerships, enabling it to organize national-level competitions and events. The business model is non-profit, focusing on cultural promotion rather than revenue generation. Target customers include municipalities and heritage professionals. Growth indicators include ongoing annual competitions and event broadcasts. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving multiple government and cultural organizations, which supports credibility and resource sharing. Operationally, the association maintains a focused digital presence with clear messaging and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form practices. However, it lacks comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating gaps in formal security governance. Data protection practices are minimal, with no explicit privacy policy or GDPR compliance statements visible. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial site but could be improved to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska, z.s.
Registration number
59007 (Městský soud v Praze, oddíl L, vložka číslo 59007)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sdružení historických sídel Čech, Moravy a Slezska, z.s.
Description
The website represents a non-profit association focused on historic towns in Czechia, promoting the 'Historic Town of the Year' competition and related cultural heritage programs.
Key services
Organizing the Historic Town of the Year competition, Providing information on regeneration programs, Publishing news and event updates related to historic towns, Partnering with government and cultural institutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Public4u CMS, Mapy.cz API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with hidden fields and autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with English option.
  3. No privacy or terms of service pages found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  7. Site uses a custom CMS (Public4u) and integrates Mapy.cz map API.
  8. Partner logos link to reputable government and cultural organizations.
  9. No advertising or marketing scripts detected.
  10. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or CZ NIC policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Public4u CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and jQuery UI libraries for interactivity and UI components. It integrates the Mapy.cz API for map functionalities. The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO and mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate, with no significant delays or errors observed. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and clear navigation menus. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced front-end technologies, indicating a traditional web architecture. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with historickemestoroku.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review historickemestoroku.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.