Skip to main content

Security report for hiperformer.digital

Hi Performer GmbH · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hi Performer GmbH is a small digital marketing agency based in Graz, Austria, specializing in performance marketing and social selling. The company targets businesses seeking to increase brand awareness, reach desired audiences, and drive sales through online and social media channels. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, emphasizing measurable marketing results. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tools such as WPBakery, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, and comprehensive cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. No critical vulnerabilities or security issues were detected. Overall, the website is well-structured, performant, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting the company's credibility and trustworthiness in the digital marketing sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hiperformer.digital

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hi Performer GmbH operates in the competitive digital marketing sector, focusing on performance marketing and social selling services. Their business model revolves around providing tailored marketing solutions to clients, leveraging data-driven strategies to optimize campaigns. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded around 2020, with a clear regional focus in Austria. They maintain active social media profiles on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn, enhancing their market reach and client engagement. The use of advanced marketing tools and analytics platforms suggests a commitment to delivering measurable results. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. The website's comprehensive privacy and cookie policies reflect a strong compliance culture, which is a competitive advantage in the European market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate spam and bot attacks. While some security headers like Content-Security-Policy are partially implemented or detected via script behavior, others such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly present, representing areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The website uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, which are configured with consent management. Overall, the security measures are appropriate for a small digital agency, but enhancing header configurations and regular security audits would strengthen defenses further.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to reduce risks from cross-site scripting and other injection attacks.
  2. Add missing security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  3. Conduct regular vulnerability scans and keep all WordPress plugins and core updated to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  4. Ensure all forms have robust input validation and CSRF protections to prevent injection and forgery attacks.
  5. Maintain transparency and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to reflect any changes in data processing or third-party services.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Hi Performer GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hi Performer GmbH
Description
Performance Marketing: Wunschzielgruppen ansprechen, Bekanntheit steigern, Verkäufe erzielen - wir setzen deine Ziele für dich in Zahlen um!
Key services
Performance Marketing, Social Selling, Online Marketing, Social Media Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ActiveCampaign
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form spam protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
ActiveCampaign
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at businesses seeking digital marketing services.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with detailed cookie consent management.
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, but no negative indicators from website content.
  6. No security incidents or disclosures found on the site.
  7. No explicit or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and optimized with WP Rocket for performance. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and cookie consent is handled by Real Cookie Banner Pro, indicating a modern and compliant technical stack. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized, with preloading of fonts and scripts. Integration with multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and ActiveCampaign demonstrates a sophisticated marketing infrastructure. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital marketing presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hiperformer.digital. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hiperformer.digital.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.