Skip to main content

Security report for himinds.com

TrackInvest AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TrackInvest AB is a small Swedish seed stage investment company specializing in partnering with and investing in early-stage technology startups. Their business model focuses on active involvement with entrepreneurs to help turn tech ideas into profitable businesses. The company has founded or invested in several subsidiaries including Insert Talent, HiMinds, AutomationEight, and Power Concern, covering sectors from talent management to sustainable energy solutions. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their business and team but lacks published privacy, cookie, and security policies. Technically, the website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome, with responsive design and good navigation. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic, and no CMS or hosting details are evident. No analytics or advertising scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and published policies related to data protection or incident response. No forms or user data collection mechanisms are present, reducing risk exposure. The absence of HTTPS status data limits full security assessment. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. The overall risk is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency would enhance trust and reduce potential compliance risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching himinds.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TrackInvest occupies a niche market as a seed stage investor and active partner in technology startups, focusing on early-stage companies with strong technical ideas. Their competitive advantage lies in hands-on involvement and a proven track record of bootstrapping companies to profitability. The business model relies on equity stakes and operational support. Target customers include passionate entrepreneurs and tech professionals seeking career growth. The company ecosystem includes subsidiaries specializing in talent acquisition, software development leadership, agile transformation, and sustainable energy solutions. Growth indicators include multiple founded companies and a clear sector focus. Partnerships appear internal with subsidiaries rather than external third parties.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with no visible forms or data collection reducing attack surface. However, the lack of security headers and absence of HTTPS confirmation are weaknesses. No published privacy or cookie policies indicate compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated due to missing contact channels for security issues. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Overall, the security culture appears minimal but not negligent. Business impact of these gaps is moderate given the limited data collection but should be addressed to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to meet GDPR and user transparency requirements.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure the website is served exclusively over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and test SSL configuration.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve security posture and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TrackInvest AB
Description
TrackInvest is an active partner and seed stage investor focused on helping passionate entrepreneurs and inventors turn tech ideas into successful businesses. The company has a proven track record of bootstrapping companies and making them profitable quickly. They have founded or invested in companies such as Insert Talent, HiMinds, AutomationEight, and Power Concern, focusing on talent management, tech staffing, agile transformation, and sustainable energy solutions.
Key services
Seed stage investment, Active partnership, Talent identification and utilization, Technical leadership and software development staffing
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, Popper.js, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. Contact information limited to emails in team section; no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  3. No forms present on the website; no user data collection detected.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  7. Business focuses on seed investment and tech staffing with clear subsidiary companies.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond Font Awesome and Google Fonts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern frontend stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery and Popper.js for interactivity, and Font Awesome for icons. The HTML is well-structured with semantic sections and navigation. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or analytics detected. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are limited to basic ARIA roles and screen reader text. No CMS or backend platform is identified. Hosting provider and SSL details are not provided, limiting full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with himinds.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review himinds.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.