Skip to main content

Security report for hillsretailorder.com

Other · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hill's Retail Order operates a retail ordering platform with a website titled 'Hill's Retail Order'. The domain is well-established since 2000, indicating a mature presence. However, the website content is minimal with no visible business descriptions, contact information, or user-facing content in the provided HTML. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript frameworks such as Angular, usage of Font Awesome for icons, and performance monitoring via Boomerang. Hosting appears to leverage Akamai CDN services. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact or business verification information is present, limiting trust and compliance confidence. Overall, the site appears functional but lacks transparency and comprehensive user information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hillsretailorder.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hillsretailorder.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
127
Employees
0
Customers
127
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hillsretailorder.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind hillsretailorder.com appears to be a retail order platform, likely serving a niche or internal audience given the minimal public content. The lack of visible contact details, privacy policies, or terms suggests a limited public-facing marketing approach. The domain age supports legitimacy, but absence of business identifiers or certifications limits external trust signals. The technology stack is modern and performance-aware, indicating some investment in infrastructure. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business model likely revolves around retail order processing, but details are not disclosed. Growth indicators and market positioning cannot be determined from the available data.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer lock status, which are positive indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected in the HTML. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of third-party analytics and identity management scripts (Gigya) introduces potential privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture requires improvements in header implementation, DNS security, and transparency to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add clear contact information and incident response channels including security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Font Awesome, Boomerang (performance monitoring)
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Boomerang
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Gigya
Marketing tools
Gigya
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and performance monitoring tools.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No business identifying information or certifications displayed.
  8. External domains mostly related to fonts, analytics, and identity management.
  9. Content is minimal and mostly technical with no visible business description or user-facing content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Angular framework with modular JavaScript and performance monitoring via Boomerang. Font Awesome is used for iconography, and jQuery is included likely for legacy or specific UI components. Hosting appears to leverage Akamai CDN services, improving global delivery and performance. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level and includes accessibility outlines for focus states. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or structured data detected. No CMS is identified. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preloading techniques. Technical debt appears low but the lack of visible content and policies suggests incomplete site development or a private/internal use case.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hillsretailorder.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hillsretailorder.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.