Skip to main content

Security report for hexarmor.com

HexArmor · Manufacturing · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HexArmor is a well-established global leader in the manufacturing and distribution of high-performance personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves, eyewear, helmets, hearing protection, and body protection. The company targets safety professionals and industrial workers, providing innovative and reliable safety solutions designed to improve workplace safety and compliance. Their market position is strong, supported by extensive product lines and educational content that reinforce their brand as a trusted PPE provider. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern tracking and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized, well-structured, and SEO-friendly, with good performance and accessibility features. The use of cookie consent tools and privacy policies indicates a commitment to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern but may be due to privacy protection or registrar policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and secure with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and WHOIS data clarity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and verifying domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hexarmor.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hexarmor.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hexarmor.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HexArmor operates in the manufacturing sector, specializing in PPE products for industrial and safety markets. Their business model focuses on product innovation, direct sales, and educational content to drive customer engagement and compliance. The company leverages partnerships, such as with safetygloves.com for e-commerce, to expand market reach. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product portfolio, multilingual support, and active social media presence. The company maintains a strong brand identity and market leadership through continuous innovation and customer-centric solutions.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliance, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options, absence of a public security policy, and no incident response contact reduce overall security maturity. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate risks. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact website security. Enhancing these areas would strengthen the security culture and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify standard security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide an incident response contact email to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance trust and legitimacy perception.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
HexArmor
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HexArmor
Description
HexArmor is a global leader in high-performance multi-category personal protective equipment (PPE), including safety gloves, safety eyewear, safety helmets, hearing protection, and arm & body protection. Trusted by safety professionals in demanding industries worldwide, HexArmor's innovative products and services work to meet and exceed standards, improve safety cultures, and increase compliance – helping every worker get home safe, every day.
Key services
Safety gloves, Safety eyewear, Safety helmets, Hearing protection, Arm and body protection, Footwear
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Wistia Video Embeds, Iubenda Cookie Solution, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Turbolinks
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Iubenda Cookie Solution, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent design
  3. Comprehensive product and educational resources
  4. Multiple language options available
  5. Robust cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  6. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  7. No visible security or privacy policy pages explicitly linked in header/footer but likely present
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML content
  9. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. The front-end leverages Bootstrap for responsive design and Turbolinks for navigation speed. Video content is embedded via Wistia. Cookie consent is managed by Iubenda and OneTrust, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with structured data (JSON-LD) providing rich metadata for search engines. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with room for optimization in loading times and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hexarmor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hexarmor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.