Skip to main content

Security report for hentaiknight.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website hentaiknight.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) block, specifically error 1005 indicating that the ASN of the visitor's IP address is banned by the site owner. This prevents any meaningful content or business information from being retrieved or analyzed. The domain is registered since 2009 with GoDaddy.com, LLC and is not privacy protected, indicating some level of legitimacy. However, the lack of accessible content, absence of privacy or cookie policies, and no visible contact information severely limit the ability to assess the business model, services, or compliance posture. Technically, the site uses Cloudflare for security and performance but does not have DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. Overall, the site’s security posture and privacy compliance cannot be fully evaluated due to the block, resulting in a low AI score and limited insights.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hentaiknight.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the WAF block, no direct business intelligence data such as company name, market position, or services could be extracted. The domain age suggests a long-standing presence, but no branding or business details are publicly visible. The site appears to target a niche audience related to its domain name but specifics are unavailable. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of accessible content and contact details limits assessment of revenue streams or growth indicators.

Security posture

The site employs Cloudflare as a security and performance provider, which is a positive indicator. However, the absence of DNSSEC and no visible security headers or policies reduces the security maturity assessment. The WAF block indicates active security controls but also restricts legitimate access, which may impact user experience. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not demonstrate GDPR compliance or data protection officer contact information. Overall, the security posture is unknown beyond the presence of Cloudflare WAF.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide accessible contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Review WAF rules to avoid blocking legitimate users and improve user experience.
  5. Implement security headers and conduct regular security audits to identify vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Access denied page indicating the website owner has blocked the ASN of the visitor's IP address via Cloudflare WAF with error 1005. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully blocked by Cloudflare WAF with error 1005 due to ASN block.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the landing page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. No social media or external business-related links found except Cloudflare and developer links.
  6. No security headers or meta tags visible due to minimal HTML content.
  7. Domain is old and registered with GoDaddy without privacy protection.
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  9. Website is inaccessible for content analysis due to WAF block.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is protected by Cloudflare, which provides CDN, WAF, and performance optimization. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare name servers. The HTML content is minimal and only shows an access denied message, indicating a block at the network or application firewall level. No CMS or other frameworks are detectable. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site does not have DNSSEC enabled, which is a technical gap. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected beyond Cloudflare’s own performance beacon. The technical infrastructure appears basic but secure at the perimeter level.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hentaiknight.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hentaiknight.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.