Skip to main content

Security report for henkel.rs

Henkel · Manufacturing · Serbia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Henkel Serbia operates as a regional branch of the global Henkel group, specializing in manufacturing and distributing consumer and industrial products including hair care, laundry detergents, fabric softeners, adhesives, sealants, and functional coatings. The company holds a leading market position in both industrial and consumer sectors within Serbia and the broader region. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design, clear navigation, and mobile optimization, supporting a broad target audience including consumers and business clients. Technically, the site employs a modern JavaScript stack with multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, leveraging CoreMedia CMS technology. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and Content-Security-Policy headers, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching henkel.rs

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Henkel Serbia benefits from its affiliation with the global Henkel group, leveraging strong brand recognition and a diversified product portfolio. The business model focuses on manufacturing and distributing both consumer goods and industrial adhesives and coatings. The company targets both retail consumers and industrial clients, emphasizing sustainability and innovation. The website's multilingual support and extensive external linking to Henkel group domains indicate a well-integrated corporate ecosystem. Marketing and analytics tools suggest active user engagement and data-driven strategies. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main page may indicate a preference for contact via dedicated contact pages or forms. The company appears to maintain a strong market presence with consistent branding and professional content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and a Content-Security-Policy header restricting resource loading to trusted domains. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, necessitating vigilant monitoring. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently on the website.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Review and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve performance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with best practices and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Henkel
Description
Henkel zauzima vodeće pozicije u oblastima industrijskog poslovanja i proizvoda široke potrošnje: portfolio sadrži proizvode za negu kose, deterdžente za pranje veša, omekšivače tkanine, lepkove, zaptivače i funkcionalne premaze.
Key services
Hair care products, Laundry detergents, Fabric softeners, Adhesives, Sealants, Functional coatings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, GSAP, Highcharts, Isotope, SwiperJS, Mustache, Modernizr, Webtrekk analytics, OneTrust cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Webtrekk, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, FullStory
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads, Reddit Ads, Adsrvr
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Webtrekk, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, FullStory
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Webtrekk Analytics, FriendlyCaptcha
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  4. Multiple external analytics and marketing scripts used
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity
  7. Content is business and consumer product focused with no adult or questionable content
  8. Security headers present but could be improved with additional policies
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, recommended for improved DNS security
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries such as GSAP for animations, Highcharts for data visualization, Isotope for layout, and SwiperJS for sliders. The CMS appears to be CoreMedia, a professional enterprise content management system. The site is mobile optimized and includes responsive images and fonts. Performance is moderate, with multiple external resources loaded. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting details are limited, but the domain registrar is United Internet d.o.o. Security headers are present but could be expanded. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional corporate website with room for optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with henkel.rs. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review henkel.rs.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.