Skip to main content

Security report for headspinui.com

Headspin UI · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Headspin UI is a newly launched technology company specializing in a UI framework and wireframe collections tailored for Breakdance users. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence built on WordPress, leveraging modern plugins and frameworks such as Easy Digital Downloads and Breakdance builder. The company targets web designers and developers seeking efficient tools to accelerate website creation. Technically, the site is well-implemented with responsive design, accessible color schemes, and fluid typography, though some security headers could be improved. The security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear cookie consent and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align with the business claims, indicating legitimacy despite the domain's recent creation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to strengthen trust and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching headspinui.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital product sales through a SaaS-like model offering UI frameworks and wireframe libraries. Its market position is niche but well-defined, serving Breakdance builder users with premium components, documentation, and community engagement via Facebook and Discord. The business model relies on digital downloads and subscriptions, supported by Easy Digital Downloads infrastructure. Growth indicators include monthly wireframe updates and active community channels. The company maintains consistent branding and professional content, enhancing credibility. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident, indicating an independent small business.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of Content-Security-Policy headers and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. The site uses self-hosted analytics and error monitoring, reducing reliance on third-party trackers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology business but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Maintain and document data retention policies to improve privacy transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Headspin UI
Description
Headspin UI is a framework and wireframe collection designed for Breakdance users to build beautiful websites faster with features like dynamic color system, fluid typography, modular scale, and dark/light mode.
Key services
UI framework, Wireframe collections, Premium components, Documentation and tutorials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery, Easy Digital Downloads, Breakdance builder, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Breakdance, Easy Digital Downloads
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
GlitchTip (self-hosted error monitoring)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
notrack.headspinui.com (self-hosted analytics)
Marketing tools
Easy Digital Downloads marketing extensions, Complianz GDPR cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based product site for a UI framework targeting Breakdance users.
  2. Content is rich with images, testimonials, and detailed product descriptions.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or adult content.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Domain is new but consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with the Breakdance builder and Easy Digital Downloads plugins, indicating a modern and extensible tech stack. It uses jQuery and custom JavaScript for UI enhancements, including password toggle features and theme switching. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing DNS security and performance benefits. Performance is moderate with optimized images and preloading strategies. Accessibility is addressed through color contrast algorithms and fluid typography. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site could benefit from additional security headers and performance optimizations but overall demonstrates a solid technical foundation for a small digital product company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with headspinui.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review headspinui.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.