Skip to main content

Security report for headspin.no

Headspin AS · Other · Norway

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Headspin AS is a Norwegian creative agency based in Trondheim, specializing in integrated communication services including strategy, campaign development, design, text production, 3D visualization, website and app development, and film production. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking comprehensive communication and branding solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a medium-sized team and a solid client portfolio. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and multiple analytics platforms including Matomo and Plausible, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements can be made by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, with clear business information and certifications such as Miljøfyrtårn enhancing credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching headspin.no

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention headspin.no, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
22
Employees
2
Customers
9
Third parties
11
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for headspin.no.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –gitlab.headspin.no2026-05-25
  • –gitlab.headspin.no2026-01-03

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Headspin operates in the creative and communication sector, serving a diverse client base including public institutions and private companies. Their business model focuses on delivering end-to-end creative solutions under one roof, leveraging a team of 30 professionals. The company has a strong market position regionally, supported by a portfolio of notable clients and visible trust indicators. Revenue streams likely include project-based fees for design, digital development, and film production services. The company maintains active social media channels and uses analytics tools to monitor engagement and performance. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor dedicated contact channels for security issues, which could be a gap in organizational security maturity. The use of multiple analytics platforms is balanced with some privacy considerations, but the lack of a cookie consent banner may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Headspin AS
Registration number
914 036 534
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Headspin AS
Description
Vi tenker, konkretiserer, utvikler og produserer alt fra strategi, kampanje, design og tekst – til 3D-visualisering, nettside, app og film.
Key services
Strategy, Campaigns, Design, Text production, 3D visualization, Website development, App development, Film production
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Maps API, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Plausible Analytics, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress theme (custom)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with privacy considerations

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Plausible, Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Plausible, Metricool
Marketing tools
Matomo, Plausible, Metricool
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in Norwegian with professional business focus
  3. No contact phone numbers explicitly labeled found
  4. Multiple social media links to Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn
  5. No visible forms on homepage; contact likely via email links or contact page
  6. Use of multiple analytics tools with some privacy consideration
  7. No cookie consent banner detected
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to registry policy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and uses a variety of modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and jQuery. Analytics are implemented via Matomo, Plausible, and Metricool, indicating a focus on data-driven insights. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with headspin.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review headspin.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.