Skip to main content

Security report for head.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.head.com/en_FI/ appears to be a professional e-commerce platform focused on sports equipment and apparel. The site utilizes modern frontend technologies such as React and integrates third-party services like Yotpo for customer reviews and Adyen for payment processing. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, indicating either privacy protection or registry restrictions, which limits the ability to verify domain ownership and legitimacy fully. The website content is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking access, but lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no explicit contact information is provided in the analyzed HTML content. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or SSL configuration details in the provided data.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of head.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching head.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
83
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website likely operates in the retail sector specializing in sports-related products. The use of Yotpo suggests a focus on customer engagement and reviews, while Adyen integration indicates a robust payment infrastructure. The absence of detailed business information, contact details, or certifications on the site reduces transparency and trustworthiness. The domain's WHOIS data absence is a concern but may be justified by privacy needs. The target audience is general consumers interested in sports equipment and apparel. The business model is e-commerce retail, but detailed market positioning and growth indicators are not discernible from the provided data.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic. The site is accessible over HTTPS (implied by the URL scheme), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the lack of security policies, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security maturity. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests potential compliance issues with GDPR or other privacy regulations. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, transparency, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure WHOIS information is complete and transparent to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Slick Carousel, Yotpo, Adyen Checkout
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yotpo
Marketing tools
Yotpo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain ownership verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the provided HTML content.
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Site uses modern frontend technologies including React and third-party services like Yotpo for reviews and Adyen for payments.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details provided; security posture is minimal based on available data.
  7. Content is related to sports equipment and apparel, safe for general audiences.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  9. No certifications or compliance frameworks mentioned.
  10. Site design and content quality are basic with room for improvement in professionalism and trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern React-based frontend with slick carousel components and integrates third-party services like Yotpo for reviews and Adyen for payment processing. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate based on the complexity of the frontend and third-party integrations. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with no meta titles or descriptions found in the provided HTML snippet. Technical debt may exist due to missing security headers and lack of compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100 +43Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 29/100High27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with head.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review head.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.