Skip to main content

Security report for hawkeyepedershaab.com

Afinitas · Manufacturing · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Afinitas is a manufacturing company specializing in equipment and services for producing concrete pipe and precast products. Established in 2014, the company targets B2B customers in the infrastructure and construction sectors. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand presence and a professional digital footprint. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, leveraging modern SEO and marketing tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, although DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and stability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hawkeyepedershaab.com

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Afinitas operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on concrete pipe and precast product equipment. The business model is B2B, serving manufacturers and infrastructure companies. The company maintains an active online presence with multiple social media channels and uses advanced marketing tools to track user engagement and conversions. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. The domain age and registration details support the company's established market position. No suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data was found, enhancing trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, representing potential areas for hardening. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA scripts indicates some protection against automated abuse. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header policies and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security policy or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Afinitas
Description
Afinitas builds equipment and provides services for producing concrete pipe and precast products.
Key services
Equipment manufacturing for concrete pipe production, Services related to precast concrete products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Nextend Smart Slider
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA script (implied by recaptcha.js)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adwords
Marketing tools
Google Adwords
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for product quoting
  2. Strong SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data
  3. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust
  4. Multiple social media channels linked
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business profile
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform with WooCommerce for product quoting functionality. It uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Nextend Smart Slider for enhanced UI. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are integrated for marketing and user behavior tracking. The site loads a variety of CSS and JS assets, indicating a feature-rich but potentially heavier page load. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features appear basic. Hosting details are not explicit, but domain registration is stable. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to optimize asset loading and caching. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to address security and performance best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hawkeyepedershaab.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hawkeyepedershaab.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.