Skip to main content

Security report for hartmann.info

Paul Hartmann AG · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paul Hartmann AG operates an international healthcare website providing product information and customer support across multiple countries. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with a domain age of 23 years and consistent registrant information. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript frameworks, Sitecore CMS, and extensive use of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. However, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS encryption, which is a critical security concern. Despite enabling HSTS, the absence of SSL undermines secure communications. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. The website's performance is slow, with a load time exceeding 11 seconds, which may impact user experience. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of hartmann.info. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hartmann.info

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hartmann.info, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
444
Employees
30
Customers
302
Third parties
112
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 25 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hartmann.info.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-06-06
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-06-01
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-05-28
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-05-28
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-05-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a large enterprise in the healthcare sector, targeting healthcare professionals and customers globally through localized country sites. Its business model focuses on B2B and B2C product distribution and information dissemination. The presence of multiple country-specific domains and corporate site links indicates a broad partnership ecosystem and international market reach. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and advertising. The mature domain age and consistent WHOIS data reinforce the company's legitimacy and established market presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While HSTS is enabled, it is ineffective without HTTPS. No security headers were detected, and session resumption and OCSP stapling are disabled, indicating suboptimal TLS configuration. The website uses multiple third-party scripts and cookies, which increases the attack surface but is managed with a consent mechanism. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and enhancement of security headers are recommended to improve the security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve TLS performance and security.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and cookies to mitigate risks.
  5. Improve website performance to reduce load times and enhance user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack with RequireJS and uses Sitecore CMS, as indicated by analytics cookies. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. Despite modern technologies, the site suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a significant technical debt. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features but could benefit from improved SEO and faster resource loading. Technical risks include potential exposure due to missing HTTPS and lack of security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hartmann.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hartmann.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.