Skip to main content

Security report for hartmann.info

PAUL HARTMANN AG · Healthcare · Germany

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PAUL HARTMANN AG operates a global healthcare business specializing in medical and hygiene products. Their website serves as a country selection portal, directing users to localized content and product information. The company maintains a strong market position with a professional online presence and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, reflecting compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Technically, the site uses modern technologies including Sitecore CMS, Cloudflare hosting, and various analytics and marketing tools, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and consent mechanisms, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally managed, with no signs of malicious activity or content blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

Keep watching hartmann.info

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hartmann.info, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
444
Employees
30
Customers
302
Third parties
112
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 25 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hartmann.info.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-06-06
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-06-01
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-05-28
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-05-28
  • –stsms.app.hartmann.info2026-05-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets healthcare professionals, distributors, and consumers worldwide, leveraging localized websites to cater to regional markets. Their business model combines B2B and B2C sales of medical and hygiene products. The presence of multiple localized domains and a corporate site indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. The extensive use of analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and advertising. The lack of direct contact information on this page may indicate centralized contact points elsewhere, typical for large enterprises. The company appears well-established and focused on maintaining regulatory compliance and brand consistency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Cookies include CSRF protection and bot detection, enhancing security. However, explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options are not evident and should be implemented to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response information is a gap that could be addressed to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance contact information availability for security and general inquiries to improve user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure compliance and minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PAUL HARTMANN AG
Description
HARTMANN is a healthcare company providing medical and hygiene products with a global presence. The website serves as a country selection portal directing users to localized content and product information.
Key services
Medical products, Hygiene products, Product information, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
RequireJS, Cookiebot, Cloudflare, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Sitecore Engagement Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • CSRF protection cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Yandex Metrica, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Yandex Ads, Amazon Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrica
Marketing tools
Cookiebot Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a country selection portal for a global healthcare company.
  2. Content is professional and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on this page.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request and privacy protection.
  6. No security challenge or WAF blocking detected.
  7. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including RequireJS for module loading, Sitecore CMS for content management, and Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Yandex Metrica, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. The use of IndexedDB and HTML local storage for cookies indicates advanced client-side data handling. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected, but optimization of security headers and performance tuning could further improve the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hartmann.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hartmann.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.