HARJU ELEKTER UAB is a Lithuanian contract manufacturing company specializing in engineering and production of multi-drive systems, power distribution, and prototyping services primarily for industrial and marine sectors. The company operates under the Harju Elekter Group and offers Engineer-To-Order, Make-To-Order, and Assemble-To-Order business models. Their market position is that of a specialized manufacturer with capabilities for fast marine class certification and full load testing. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with Cherry Framework and Bootstrap, featuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers and incident response information are lacking. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site reflects a credible and established business with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
58
Not counted
Email security: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention harjuelekter.lt, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for harjuelekter.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company targets industrial and marine clients requiring customized electrical and mechanical engineering solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in advanced engineering tools (Eplan, Solid Edge), fast certification processes, and comprehensive prototyping and testing capabilities. The business model focuses on tailored manufacturing services, managing complex supply chains and custom components. The presence of a parent company domain and linked Code of Conduct indicates a structured corporate governance. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website and active use of digital marketing tools like Google Analytics. Strategic partnerships appear limited to the parent group, with no visible affiliate or reseller networks.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting external reporting channels. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms which may expose the company to GDPR non-compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be enhanced by adopting best practices and formalizing security policies.
Recommendations
Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to demonstrate security governance and provide clear contact channels for security issues.
Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated components.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
HARJU ELEKTER UAB
Description
HARJU ELEKTER UAB provides contract manufacturing services specializing in multi-drive systems, power distribution and MCC systems, and prototyping with advanced electrical and mechanical engineering for industry and marine applications.
Key services
Multi-drive systems design and manufacturing, Power distribution and motor control switchgear systems, End-to-end prototyping and assembly services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Font Awesome, FlexSlider, Owl Carousel, Cherry Framework
Frameworks
Cherry Framework, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
No visible vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed and well-structured
Content is focused on manufacturing and engineering services
Contact details are clearly provided with physical address and phone
Privacy policy is present but cookie consent is missing
No visible security policy or incident response information
Uses common WordPress plugins and frameworks
Google Analytics is used for tracking
No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS using Cherry Framework and Bootstrap for responsive design. It leverages common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and plugins like FlexSlider and Owl Carousel for UI components. Google Maps API is integrated for location display. The site loads moderately fast with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta description present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Hosting appears stable with domain registration through Zone Media OÜ. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party plugins which require regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with harjuelekter.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review harjuelekter.lt.