Skip to main content

Security report for hallgruppen.lv

Hallgruppen · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hallgruppen is a Latvia-based company specializing in tent halls, metal constructions, and building projects, serving various industries such as logistics, manufacturing, agriculture, sports, and events. The company operates a professional website built on WordPress, featuring a comprehensive product catalog and regional presence across multiple European countries. The site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and formal policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website's professional design, active social media presence, and detailed cookie disclosures indicate a legitimate business. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical maturity and business credibility with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hallgruppen.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hallgruppen holds a strong regional market position as a provider of industrial and commercial construction solutions, focusing on tent halls and related infrastructure. Their business model targets B2B clients across multiple sectors, leveraging a network of regional websites to serve different European markets. The company emphasizes product variety and customization, offering temporary and permanent structures, event tents, and accessories. Growth potential is supported by a multi-country presence and active digital marketing efforts. However, the lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies on the website suggests areas for operational transparency enhancement. Partnerships with regional domains indicate a cohesive brand strategy and market expansion approach.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Tracking and analytics tools from Google and Microsoft are used extensively, with clear cookie categorization and user consent options. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The lack of WHOIS data restricts domain legitimacy verification, posing a moderate risk. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced header implementation, published policies, and security contact details to improve compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  4. Include explicit company contact emails and phone numbers on the website for transparency and support.
  5. Seek to resolve WHOIS data access issues to enable domain trust verification and improve legitimacy scores.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hallgruppen
Description
Hallgruppen is a company specializing in tent halls, constructions, and building projects. They offer a wide range of construction products including tent halls, insulated halls, warehouses, sandwich panel buildings, metal constructions, sports halls, and more. They also provide temporary warehouses, event tents, and accessories.
Key services
Tent halls, Insulated halls, Warehouses, Sandwich panel buildings, Metal constructions, Sports halls, Temporary warehouses, Event tents, Accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Ninja Forms plugin, Cookiebot consent management, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Bing tracking, Microsoft Clarity
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Microsoft
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the construction industry.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Multiple social media profiles linked, indicating active online presence.
  7. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  9. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and forms.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Ninja Forms. It leverages jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with use of CDN resources for fonts and scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could affect security posture and domain trust. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance privacy compliance for better overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hallgruppen.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hallgruppen.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.