Skip to main content

Security report for hak.ee

häk agency · Other · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

häk agency is a strategic design and digital agency based in Estonia, founded in 2018. The company offers comprehensive services including branding, web environments, and advertising, serving over 500 satisfied clients. Their market position is strong, supported by client testimonials, awards, and certifications that enhance their credibility. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern tools such as Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a robust infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness, with minor recommendations to enhance security headers and publish security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hak.ee

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the digital creative sector, targeting businesses seeking strategic branding and digital marketing solutions. Their business model is service-based, focusing on delivering tailored marketing and design projects. The portfolio and client base indicate a medium-sized company with a solid reputation in Estonia. Partnerships and social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube support their marketing efforts. The company leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools to optimize client campaigns and internal operations. Growth indicators include a diverse portfolio, multiple client testimonials, and recognized certifications. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality, client engagement, and continuous innovation in digital marketing services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms to prevent spam, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly found and should be implemented to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing attacks. Overall, the security posture is solid for a digital agency but could benefit from formalized policies and additional header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and continue optimizing mobile experience to maintain high usability standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Zone Media OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
häk agency
Description
Oleme avatud ja uuendusmeelne digisuunitlusega strateegiline disaini- ja veebiagentuur, kus töötavad pikaajaliste turunduskogemustega inimesed.
Key services
Bränd (Branding), Veebikeskkonnad (Web environments), Reklaam (Advertising)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 in forms
  • Consent-based cookie scripts
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Gravity Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital and strategic design agency based in Estonia.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and localized in Estonian with English alternate.
  3. Multiple client testimonials and portfolio items with awards indicate strong market presence.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including multiple contact forms with GDPR-compliant consent.
  6. No critical security issues detected; HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Gravity Forms for form management, jQuery for scripting, and Owl Carousel for UI components. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are managed via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site uses modern JavaScript and CSS assets, with asynchronous loading to improve performance. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Zone Media OÜ, a reputable Estonian provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some security headers are missing. The site includes multiple interactive forms with GDPR-compliant consent checkboxes and reCAPTCHA integration, indicating attention to data protection and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hak.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hak.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.