Skip to main content

Security report for hainzl.at

HAINZL Industriesysteme GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HAINZL Industriesysteme GmbH is a well-established Austrian industrial technology company specializing in system technology, testing technology, hydrogen technologies, process automation, embedded systems, and electrical engineering. With a history dating back to 1965, it holds a leading position in the European market, supported by multiple subsidiaries across Europe. The company targets industrial clients in machinery, vehicle manufacturing, metal industry, and construction sectors, offering comprehensive technological solutions and services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, multilingual support, and strong SEO practices. However, the technical infrastructure shows critical security weaknesses, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which severely impact the security posture. While security headers are properly configured, the lack of HTTPS undermines trust and data protection. Privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the site is professional and credible but requires urgent security improvements to align with best practices and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hainzl.at

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HAINZL operates a B2B business model focused on delivering integrated system solutions and manufacturing services in industrial automation and technology sectors. Its market positioning as a leading European system provider is reinforced by a diversified portfolio of business divisions and subsidiaries, enabling broad geographic reach and sector coverage. The company emphasizes innovation, quality, and customer-centricity, supported by a strong corporate culture and long-term employee engagement. Revenue streams likely include product sales, system integration, service contracts, and specialized technology solutions. The partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries and joint ventures in Austria, Germany, Slovenia, Serbia, and the Czech Republic, enhancing market penetration and operational synergies. Strategic observations highlight a focus on technological leadership, sustainability, and international expansion.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is currently low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. Security headers such as X-XSS-Protection, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy are correctly implemented, indicating awareness of security best practices. No known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected. However, the lack of HTTPS is a critical issue that must be addressed immediately. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security.txt file, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is supported by comprehensive policies, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security culture appears moderate but requires significant enhancements in encryption and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and SSL configurations to maintain best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
HAINZL Industriesysteme GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Oxygen Builder framework, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flickity, and AOS for animations and UI enhancements. SEO is optimized with Rank Math PRO, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. Hosting is provided by a1.net as indicated by DNS records. Performance metrics are not available, but the site includes multiple video backgrounds and carousels which may impact load times. Mobile optimization and accessibility are rated good, with responsive design and ARIA attributes present. Technical debt is low given the use of current CMS and plugins, but the critical lack of SSL/TLS is a major risk. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security configurations to enhance user experience and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hainzl.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hainzl.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.