Skip to main content

Security report for hafanplus.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website online.hafanplus.cz is an online platform offering pet insurance products primarily targeting dog owners in the Czech Republic. The site provides forms to collect pet and insurance information and offers optional add-ons for working and special dogs. The business model focuses on direct online insurance product offerings with a simple user interface. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including React, Ant Design, and Bootstrap frameworks, with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is assumed but no security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via a cookie consent banner and a linked privacy policy page. However, no contact information or business registration details are provided, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and safe but would benefit from enhanced transparency, security practices, and business credibility disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hafanplus.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hafanplus.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hafanplus.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small-scale insurance provider specializing in pet insurance products for the Czech market. The lack of detailed company information and absence of contact details limit the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The use of online forms and digital marketing tools suggests a direct-to-consumer approach. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the site. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed. Strategic observations include the need for improved business transparency and enhanced trust signals to strengthen market presence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which may impact incident handling readiness. Data protection practices are minimal, and no Data Protection Officer contact is listed. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed via cookie consent and privacy policy but lacks comprehensive documentation. Overall, the security culture appears immature and would benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear contact information including business address, phone, and email to improve credibility and compliance.
  3. Develop and publish security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed GDPR-related documentation and data retention policies.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website for insurance services related to pets (dogs), offering insurance products and optional add-ons.
Key services
Pet insurance, Optional insurance add-ons for working and special dogs
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Ant Design, Bootstrap 3 and 4, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Site uses modern frontend technologies but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with tracking opt-in/out options.
  5. No explicit contact information or business registration details found on site.
  6. No security policies or incident response information provided.
  7. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies detected.
  8. Content is focused on pet insurance products for Czech market.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with Ant Design components and Bootstrap CSS frameworks, indicating a modern frontend stack. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking or errors. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility features are minimal, with some use of ARIA roles and labels. SEO optimization is basic, with meta description and viewport tags but no Open Graph or structured data detected. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data which may affect domain trust. Modernization opportunities include improving accessibility, SEO, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hafanplus.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hafanplus.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.