Skip to main content

Security report for gympiepyramid.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gympiepyramid.org is a Japanese-language content site focused on providing recommendations and advice for cosmetics suitable for sensitive skin, targeting women with sensitive skin concerns. The site offers informational articles on product selection, skincare routines, and patch testing, positioning itself as a niche resource in the cosmetics affiliate marketing space. The business model appears to rely on content marketing and external affiliate links to related cosmetic product sites. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with a Shift_JIS charset, which is uncommon and may impact SEO and accessibility. The site includes tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro, indicating moderate user tracking activity. Security posture is weak, with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies present. WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed response, raising concerns about domain registration transparency and legitimacy. Overall, the site presents basic content with limited professional polish and low trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gympiepyramid.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the cosmetics niche, specifically targeting sensitive skin cosmetics for Japanese-speaking women. It leverages affiliate marketing through numerous external links to various unrelated domains, suggesting a broad affiliate network. The lack of clear business registration or contact details beyond a contact form limits transparency. The site likely generates revenue through affiliate commissions rather than direct sales. Its market position is that of a small niche content provider with limited brand recognition. The absence of privacy and security policies may hinder user trust and compliance with regulations such as GDPR. Growth potential depends on improving transparency, security, and content quality.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. Tracking scripts are present without visible consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness and complicates incident response. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the site is vulnerable to trust and compliance issues and should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and transparent contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish clear business contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance transparency.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and recommendations about cosmetics suitable for sensitive skin, targeting women with sensitive skin issues. It offers advice on product selection, patch testing, skincare routines, and moisturizing products.
Key services
Cosmetics product recommendations, Skincare advice
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Japanese and focuses on sensitive skin cosmetics recommendations.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found.
  3. Contact information limited to a contact form only; no emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Multiple external links to unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or partner sites.
  5. Tracking script from Research Artisan Pro detected, indicating user tracking.
  6. No visible security headers or HTTPS status information available.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or data withholding.
  8. Website uses Shift_JIS charset, which is uncommon and may affect SEO and accessibility.
  9. No social media links or business certifications found.
  10. Basic website design and navigation with limited professional polish.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The charset is Shift_JIS, which is outdated and may affect SEO and accessibility negatively. The site includes an asynchronous tracking script from Research Artisan Pro, indicating user behavior monitoring. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility features observed. SEO optimization is minimal, with only basic meta tags and canonical link present. The site lacks modern technical enhancements such as structured business data beyond a simple breadcrumb JSON-LD. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gympiepyramid.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gympiepyramid.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.