Skip to main content

Security report for gxcloud.net

GX Software · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GX Software is a technology company specializing in digital communication software and services, offering proprietary products such as XperienCentral and Engatta, alongside partnerships with leading Customer Data Platforms like BlueConic and mParticle. The company positions itself as a Platinum BlueConic Partner in EMEA, focusing on privacy-conscious, data-driven customer engagement solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses seeking integrated digital communication and customer data management solutions. Technically, the site is built on HubSpot CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, providing a good user experience with moderate performance. However, the security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of HTTPS, missing DMARC, and no security headers, which significantly lowers the overall security score. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Contact information is comprehensive and easily accessible. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gxcloud.net

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gxcloud.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gxcloud.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GX Software operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital communication and customer data platforms. Their business model combines software development with implementation and strategic partnerships, leveraging recognized platforms to enhance their offerings. The company targets medium-sized to large enterprises seeking advanced content management and customer data solutions. Their market position is strengthened by exclusive partnerships and certifications, such as the Platinum BlueConic Partner status. The website content and linked domains indicate a strong ecosystem of technology partners, enhancing their competitive advantage. The presence of multiple contact points and professional content suggests a mature business operation with a focus on customer engagement and privacy. Growth potential is supported by their integration capabilities and focus on privacy-compliant marketing technologies.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is suboptimal. The lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to potential data interception and undermines trust. The missing DMARC record increases the risk of email spoofing and phishing attacks. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options further exposes the site to common web attacks. While SPF is correctly configured and no subdomain takeover vulnerabilities were found, the overall security configuration requires immediate remediation. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating a potential gap in transparency and readiness. The site does not implement modern TLS protocols, HSTS, or OCSP stapling, which are standard best practices. These issues collectively reduce the security score and pose risks to both the company and its users.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Configure and enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Set up HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  4. Add and properly configure DMARC DNS records to protect against email spoofing.
  5. Deploy essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  6. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure with DNS managed by AWS Route 53. It uses HubSpot CMS as the platform, integrating various JavaScript libraries including jQuery, GSAP, and Swiper for UI interactions. Marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot marketing scripts are embedded for data collection and user tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, with a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5.6 seconds and 88 resources loaded. The DNS configuration includes a valid SPF record but lacks DMARC. The SSL configuration is currently invalid or missing, resulting in no HTTPS support. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires security enhancements to meet industry standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gxcloud.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gxcloud.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.