Skip to main content

Security report for gutwinski.at

Red On line (COM) · Other · Austria

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Red-on-line is a well-established provider of integrated EHS (Environment, Health, and Safety) management solutions, combining software, consulting, and legal content to support corporate compliance and sustainability efforts. The company serves a broad international clientele, with over 2000 companies across more than 85 countries, positioning itself as a leader in the HSE software and consulting market. Their business model focuses on SaaS delivery complemented by expert consulting services, targeting medium to large enterprises with complex compliance needs. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance optimizations, including caching and monitoring tools like WP Rocket and New Relic. The presence of a GDPR-compliant consent management platform (Didomi) indicates a mature approach to privacy compliance. Security posture is basic but adequate, with HSTS enabled but lacking a valid SSL certificate on the analyzed domain, which may be a legacy or redirect domain. Overall, the site demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness, though improvements in SSL configuration and additional security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gutwinski.at

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a strong brand presence with multilingual support and a comprehensive portfolio of HSE software modules, including compliance management, incident tracking, audits, risk assessments, and sustainability reporting. Their client base includes major global corporations, as evidenced by displayed logos and case studies. The parent company, Infopro Digital Gruppe, adds corporate credibility. The website's structure and content reflect a focus on B2B engagement, with clear calls to action for demos and contact. Partnerships and related domains indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The business shows signs of growth and international reach, with a large expert team and extensive jurisdiction coverage.

Security posture

Security measures include the use of strict-transport-security headers and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate on the gutwinski.at domain and absence of modern TLS protocols reduce the security score. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site uses reputable third-party services for monitoring and analytics, but could benefit from enhanced SSL configuration, additional security headers, and OCSP stapling. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which is common but could be improved for transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 on all domains, including gutwinski.at
  2. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options
  3. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security
  4. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to improve trust and transparency
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and consider publishing data retention policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, React (via WordPress), and New Relic for performance monitoring. It uses WP Rocket and Redis Object Cache for caching and performance optimization. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good navigation clarity. Hosting is provided by internex.at, with DNS and MX records indicating Microsoft Outlook for email services. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in load times and resource optimization. The site uses a GDPR-compliant consent management platform (Didomi) for cookie consent.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gutwinski.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gutwinski.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.