Skip to main content

Security report for gupy.io

Gupy · Technology · Brazil

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gupy is a leading Brazilian HR technology company offering a comprehensive SaaS platform that leverages AI to optimize recruitment, onboarding, training, employee engagement, and performance management. The company serves over 4,000 clients and positions itself as a pioneer in AI-driven recruitment in Brazil. Technically, the website is built on HubSpot CMS, hosted on Amazon AWS, and employs modern web technologies with a focus on user experience and accessibility. Security measures include a valid SSL certificate and HSTS with preload, but the site lacks modern TLS protocol support and DNSSEC, indicating room for improvement. The site extensively uses tracking and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. Overall, Gupy demonstrates a strong market presence, professional web design, and a good security posture with some areas for enhancement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gupy.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gupy.io

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gupy.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,132,945
Employees
0
Customers
1,132,905
Third parties
40
Weak passwords
14%

10,276 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gupy.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gupy operates in the technology sector, specifically HR tech, targeting HR professionals, recruiters, and job candidates in Brazil. Its business model revolves around providing AI-powered SaaS solutions for talent acquisition and management. The company emphasizes innovation, AI integration, and customer success, as evidenced by numerous case studies and a broad product portfolio. Partnerships with event platforms and privacy tool providers enhance its ecosystem. The company maintains a strong brand with consistent messaging and high-quality content, positioning itself as a trusted leader in the Brazilian HR technology market.

Security posture

The website employs a valid SSL certificate issued by Amazon RSA 2048 M03 and enforces HSTS with preload and includeSubDomains, which are strong security practices. However, it lacks support for modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are notable security gaps. The absence of a security.txt file and explicit incident response or security policy pages reduces transparency in vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed, POODLE, FREAK, or Logjam were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by enabling modern protocols, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to enhance encryption strength and compatibility.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Correct and properly configure CAA DNS records to restrict certificate issuance to authorized CAs.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies to increase transparency and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS and uses various HubSpot services including forms, analytics, and marketing automation. It is hosted on Amazon AWS with multiple A records and uses Amazon RSA 2048 certificates. The site employs modern front-end technologies including SVG graphics, CSS animations, and JavaScript for interactivity and tracking. Performance metrics indicate a slow load time (~87 seconds) and a large page size (~2.9 MB) with many resources (461), suggesting potential optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with proper use of ARIA and focus management. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data. The technical infrastructure is mature but could benefit from performance improvements and updated security protocols.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low21 findingsView report
  2. 80/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gupy.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gupy.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.