Skip to main content

Security report for gulanmusic.studio

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Electronica: New-age Ambient Meditation & Classical Music' serves as an online portfolio and music distribution platform for Latvian musician Andrei Gulaikin, known as Gulan. It targets listeners interested in electronic, ambient, new-age, meditation, and classical music genres. The site offers streaming, downloads, and detailed artist information, positioning itself as a niche artist platform with a history of international radio presence since 2005. Technically, the site is built on WordPress.com using Jetpack and Gutenberg, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Fonts. Hosting is provided by Automattic Inc., ensuring reliable infrastructure and HTTPS security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is accessible, well-structured, and professionally presented, but could improve privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gulanmusic.studio

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
45
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale artist portfolio and music distribution site, monetizing primarily through content sharing and possibly music sales or streaming. The target audience includes ambient and new-age music enthusiasts globally. The site leverages WordPress.com infrastructure, reducing operational overhead. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model focuses on artist branding and content dissemination rather than direct e-commerce. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and international radio exposure. The partnership ecosystem is limited to WordPress.com services and social media presence.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain transfer lock, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site uses secure forms for contact but lacks explicit security policies. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact emails for security and abuse reporting to enhance trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Andrei Gulaikin (pseudonym Gulan) is a Latvian musician, sound designer, and composer specializing in electronic music genres including ambient, new-age, and classical symphonic music. The site showcases his music collections, singles, and information about his work since 2005.
Key services
Music streaming, Music downloads, Artist biography and portfolio, Information on music genres and synthesizers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Gutenberg, Google Fonts, Twemoji, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack Sharing, Pinterest tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted artist portfolio for musician Andrei Gulaikin (Gulan).
  2. Content is accessible and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via a form on a dedicated contact page.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security issues.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Use of Jetpack and WordPress.com services for analytics and sharing.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress.com platform using Gutenberg blocks and Jetpack plugins, ensuring a contemporary tech stack with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of fonts and scripts. The site uses Google Fonts and Twemoji for enhanced typography and emoji support. Hosting by Automattic Inc. provides reliable infrastructure and SSL. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and implement DNSSEC. The site’s technical implementation supports a good user experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gulanmusic.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gulanmusic.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.