Skip to main content

Security report for guest-experience.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website guest-experience.com presents a login page for a guest experience platform, likely serving customers or users who have accounts. The business appears to have been established in 2017, consistent with the domain registration date. The site uses Ruby on Rails technology and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a modern and scalable technical foundation. However, the visible content is minimal, focusing solely on user authentication without additional business or policy information on this page. From a security perspective, the site implements CSRF tokens in its login form, which is a positive security control. However, no security headers were detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled for the domain, representing areas for improvement. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies on this page limits the site's compliance posture and transparency. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, suggesting minimal user tracking on this page. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent and transparent, with no privacy protection or suspicious patterns, supporting the legitimacy of the business. The website content is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit content detected. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocks, allowing full analysis. Strategic improvements in security headers, policy disclosures, and enhanced content would strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching guest-experience.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Guest Experience appears to operate in the hospitality or service sector, providing a platform for user login and management. The business model likely revolves around SaaS or platform services for guest management or experience enhancement. The lack of visible business details or contact information on this page limits deeper insights into market positioning or revenue streams. The company is small in size based on available data and uses modern cloud infrastructure. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture shows basic maturity with CSRF protection implemented on forms and HTTPS assumed (though SSL configuration details are not provided). The absence of security headers and DNSSEC reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security score is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies prominently to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance website content with clear business contact information and trust indicators to improve business credibility and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Ruby on Rails, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token implemented in form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  3. No contact information or business details visible on this page.
  4. Uses Ruby on Rails framework with CSRF protection on login form.
  5. External resources loaded from Google Fonts and AWS DNS servers.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is not close to expiry.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Ruby on Rails, a mature and secure web framework, and hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating reliable hosting. The HTML content is valid and includes CSRF tokens for form security. External resources are limited to Google Fonts and AWS DNS servers, minimizing third-party dependencies. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and modern hosting. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of metadata beyond the page title. No CMS or analytics tools are detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with guest-experience.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review guest-experience.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.