Skip to main content

Security report for gtd.eu

GTD System & Software Engineering · Technology · Spain

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GTD System & Software Engineering is a medium-sized, established technology company founded in 1987, specializing in the design, integration, and operation of complex, mission-critical software and systems for sectors including space, defense, science, logistics, microelectronics, and quantum cybersecurity. The company serves clients in 26 countries with a strong portfolio of over 1,500 projects and multiple international certifications, positioning itself as a trusted partner in high-tech industries. The website infrastructure is built on Webflow CMS with modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Weglot for multilingual support. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital presence. The technical stack and hosting are robust, leveraging CDN and modern web standards. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the site lacks a dedicated security policy page and explicit incident response contact channels. Privacy compliance is adequate with a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness, with minor recommendations to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency. The domain WHOIS data aligns well with the company’s profile, confirming legitimacy and consistency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gtd.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gtd.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
105
Employees
4
Customers
33
Third parties
68
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2025-07-28 · 8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gtd.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –gitlab.gtd.eu2025-07-28
  • –chat.gtd.eu2025-07-26
  • –gitlab.gtd.eu2025-07-20
  • –gitlab.gtd.eu2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GTD holds a strong market position as a specialized B2B provider of mission-critical software and systems engineering services. Their competitive advantage lies in deep sector expertise, long-standing client relationships, and recognized certifications. Revenue streams are primarily from engineering services, software development, and SaaS platforms via subsidiaries like Portel. The target customers are government agencies, aerospace companies, defense contractors, scientific research centers, and logistics operators. Growth indicators include active projects in cutting-edge fields such as quantum cybersecurity and space exploration. The partnership ecosystem includes subsidiaries and partners like OpenChip and LuxQuanta, enhancing their technological breadth and market reach.

Security posture

The security maturity level of GTD’s website is high, with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities in the front-end code. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of secure third-party services like Google Tag Manager further strengthen the posture. However, the lack of a published security policy and incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact trust for security-conscious clients. GDPR compliance is mostly met, but the missing cookie consent mechanism is a gap. Incident response readiness is unclear due to no visible dedicated channels. Overall, the security culture appears mature but could benefit from enhanced communication and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Add a security contact email (e.g., security@domain) to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident communication.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to improve transparency and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GTD System & Software Engineering
Description
GTD is a high-tech company specializing in the design, integration, and operation of complex, mission-critical applications and systems worldwide. They provide innovative software solutions for space, defense, science, infrastructures, robotics, logistics, microelectronics, and quantum cybersecurity sectors.
Key services
Design and development of mission-critical software and systems, Integration and operation of complex systems, Advanced control and supervision systems, Quantum cryptography and cybersecurity solutions, SaaS platforms for maritime-port logistics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Weglot (translation), jQuery, NI cRIO technology (project specific), LabVIEW (project specific)
Frameworks
Webflow CMS, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with developer ID set
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • Secure forms with no visible input vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is rich and relevant to mission-critical software and systems engineering.
  3. Strong presence of certifications and trust badges.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form only.
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite cookie policy presence.
  6. Use of multiple languages supported via Weglot.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube.
  8. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond standard privacy and legal notices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, scalable infrastructure using Webflow CMS, supported by CDN hosting for fast content delivery. The tech stack includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and Weglot for multilingual support, indicating a mature digital marketing and internationalization strategy. Performance is optimized with responsive design, lazy loading images, and video backgrounds. Technical debt appears low with clean HTML and CSS. Opportunities exist to enhance technical SEO and accessibility further. No critical technical risks were identified that could impact business operations, but ongoing maintenance of third-party integrations is recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gtd.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gtd.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.